Hi Foxy,

As I've said before I don't much care who is American President, Trump or Harris, both simply perpetuate the elitist "American Dream" of world domination through war and exploitation. BUT, if I was forced to choose one or the other, unlike several Trumpsters on here, including mhaze, ttbn and a few others from the extreme right, I couldn't vote for their folk hero that criminal Trump.

Hi Paul,

Kamala Harris is for me the only alternative to the disaster
that is Trump.

"Harris leads Trump 44% to 42% in US
Presidential race. Reuters/Ipsos poll finds."

If you...well not you but if someone who was interested in the truth and was competent with numbers to grade 5 level... if such a person looked at the poll they'd see that they admitted that their 'representative' sample contained 426 Democrat voters vs. 376 Republicans and that they admitted that it was therefore invalid. If you redo the numbers to allow for the inherent bias in the poll, it shows Trump leading.

But you'll believe what you want to believe as usual.

OTOH, as I've said on many occasions, unless he wins by at least 5% he'll lose ie he'll win the vote and lose the count as in 2020.

The Democrats putting forward a female alternative now to replace Joe Biden, will be a challenge against Donald Trump. I'm hoping they're open to other male options - but it's unlikely.

We saw what happened to Hillary Clinton. It wasn't going to work out as people saw her as a weak leader and then of course she had baggage from her husband Bill Clinton to deal with.

If Donald Trump is elected at the next election I would not be surprised as I agree that Kamala Harris does come across as elitist and she will be seen as some as a weak female leader.

I only wish there was a true third party force in U.S politics that could take on the two party players there and get better outcomes for everyone.

In terms of mhaze and the polls out so far, I'll take them with a grain of salt for so many reasons. The only poll that counts is the final vote and those who get elected.

Mr Trumpster Mhaze,

Only a week ago you were gloating over polls that showed your folk hero, The Dangerous Doctor Donald was leading 'Gah Gah' Joe by a similar margin to what 'Hotlips' Harris is leading The Donald, by now. Then there's; "unless he (DDD) wins by at least 5% he'll lose ie he'll win the vote and lose the count as in 2020." Yep, come Jan 6th you might have to dust off the buffalo horns and face paint outfit for another "storming of the Capitol".

"Only a week ago you were gloating over polls that showed your folk hero, The Dangerous Doctor Donald was leading 'Gah Gah' Joe by a similar margin to what 'Hotlips' Harris is leading The Donald, by now. "

That's wrong. I've never touted opinion polls for or against Trump.

Normally I'd put the error down to Paul's horrendous memory, inability to follow the logic of a thread and out-and-out moronosity. But this time I have to just call it out as Paul straight up lying.

Lying as in having absolutely no relationship with the truth....and being proud of it.

I'd ask for a retraction but there's precisely no chance Paul would do anything approaching such an honourable thing.

As to opinion polls, there are going to be hundreds over the next few months. If you intend to believe one or t'other, you need to scrutinise it for the types of fudges I mentioned above.
Here's the thing. The Democrats intend to try to steal the election in the same way they stole 2020 by inserting enormous numbers of fake ballots into the system in strategic counties and states. But they have a problem. If polls showed Trump up by, say, 4% in this or that state yet he suddenly loses by 1% then it would be proof of their theft. So they need at least some polls showing Trump losing in order to make the theft of the election seem feasible. That's where the poll from Rueters comes in. There'll be lots more like it.

And fools like Paul and Foxy will fall for every single one.

As to my point about Trump needing to be at least 5%-10% up to defeat the theft of the election, well that's not a new thing. Its called being outside the margin of cheating. I've been saying it since before the 2020 election... so over 5 years. Its just that such thinking goes sailing over poor Paul's head.