The Forum > General Discussion > Is there a God?
Is there a God?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Page 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- ...
- 45
- 46
- 47
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
That last sentence in the 'King Herod paragraph' was "Very convenient if you ask me, anybody can say they have been chosen by god and that the holy sp[i]rit is talking to them." (I have assumed it was an 'i' missing, not an 'e' at the end of the word. If it was the latter, we would be waiting to hear from OLO user Cuchulhainn, wouldn't we?)
I am not going to presume that I know how B_D would respond to this sentence, nor attempt to answer for him. I have, however, read the Wiki reference provided, and it touches upon some of the relevant aspects of the historical context of this incident of infanticide under Herod 'the Great'. Life and times were exceedingly turbulent and capricious in Judaea during the last years of Herod, if Flavius Josephus, the near-contemporary historian is to be believed. Unravelling the chronology of events of those last years of Herod from Josephus is quite a challenge. That Josephus (whos primary source was Nicholas of Damascus, Herod's biographer) fails to mention the slaughter of the innocents is hardly surprising.
Against the scale of what Herod planned at the time of his death, that incident pales into insignificance. Josephus' "Antiquities of the Jews", in Book 17, Chapter 6, recounts Herod's intention to have one of every family of the nation slain upon the event of his actual death, in order that there should be genuine mourning at his passing throughout his kingdom.
The slaughter of the innocents, within a year of the Census, is recounted alone by St Matthew. Matthew was a 'publican' before becoming a disciple of Jesus of Nazareth. For 'publican' read Roman tax agent, collaborator, Quisling, traitor to his nation. As such he would have likely had 'inside information' on public affairs that was simply not available or known to other writers.