From the always fatuous SR..."Big claims with no supporting evidence."

This from the chap who rushed to report "Well between 500 and 700 dead after the bombing of the Baptist Hospital in Gaza" and then couldn't find the time to correct his error.

SR of coarse got that so wrong because he fell for the misinformation from the NYT and other left leaning media. All such media have slowly walked back their claims, but no SR.

Now what do you do when you've been utterly misled by your go-to sources. Well you fall for their next set of unsupported claims. That's SR for you...." “American intelligence agencies have assessed that a deadly blast at a Gaza hospital on Tuesday killed 100 to 300 people,..." Well that's sorta, kinda an admission of error from SR and as much as his clownish behaviour will allow. So we have an unsourced claim that US intelligence have said 100-300. Of coarse, the NYT is a past-master at treating so-called anonymous sources as facts and SR is a past-master at falling for it.

Oh and the full claim was that the number was at the LOW END of the 100-300 range so still closer to my number that SR's. I wonder why SR didn't mention that? Can't blame him really - he's always struggled with numbers.

He'll never learn.

Anyway from Agence France Presse... a" a senior European intelligence source" told AFP the toll was 50 at most.

Competing claims and the answer will never be known. The only thing we do know is that Hamas outright lied and the usual bozos fell for it.

Post truth mhaze,

At it yet again.

You are putting the single unnamed and unattributed European intelligence officer's opinion from nearly a week ago against the considered and documented assessment from American intelligence services.

This really is your playground now isn't it. Snatching grabs out of left field, anything that might fly into vision to be used to shoehorn into your ideology.

And this from you: “SR of coarse(sic) got that so wrong because he fell for the misinformation from the NYT and other left leaning media. All such media have slowly walked back their claims, but no SR.”

You are so thick you then quoted my post showing I had indeed provided updated figures.

Mate you are arguing against yourself.

Give it a rest.

And note I continue to provide references while you rarely if ever do.

Further the document wasn't “unsourced” but rather was “An unclassified US intelligence assessment, provided to the AFP news agency by a Capitol Hill source, estimates the number of people killed at the hospital on Tuesday night at the “low end of the 100-to-300 spectrum.”
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/oct/20/al-ahli-arab-hospital-gaza-blast-explosion-us-intelligence-report-death-toll-estimate

Post truth mhaze,

And it was you along with other banging on about beheaded babies.

Prepared to walk that back yet?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0el9wiOBmmM

AC

" You can't say that either of these conflicts were completely unprovoked, and if you do then you need to go back and have a more thorough accounting of history."

I can't say it. I didn't say it. I'd never say it. So stop making up my opinions to suit your proclivities.

I asked Foxy a question t'other day which, as expected went unanswered. Perhaps you could have a crack....
"Given that these people you correctly call terrorists are actually the government of the people you call innocent, and that an unknown percentage of said innocents actually support the said terrorist government and that the said terrorist government is using the unknown percentage of innocents as human shields, I wonder just how Israel is expected to fight the said terrorists without endangering the supposedly innocent human shields.

What people who talk about protecting the supposed innocents are really saying is that the terrorists should be allowed to get away with their terrorism so long as they can find human shields to hide behind. "

"And it was you along with other banging on about beheaded babies.
Prepared to walk that back yet?"

Al Jazeera? Really?

Retract? Why would I retract the truth?
http://nypost.com/2023/10/23/media/fox-news-war-reporter-limits-grisly-details-of-hamas-terrorists-confession-about-israel-massacre/

As to the hospital, we've gone from 500-700 to the low 100s so SR is headed in the right direction. Still its funny that he thinks unofficial reports claiming to be from US intelligence are facts.

I have seen pictures of the site and where the Hamas rocket exploded and it is crystal clear that the blast was not from an Israeli bomb yet Morons on OLO keep on parroting Hamas's lie. What motivates these sick puppies is unclear.