Whatever blows your hair back, CJ.

Lets face it Europe and Britain are basically Islamacized.

The demographics are in Plain Numbers for anyone to see notwithstanding half of Africa packing up thier grass skirts and trying to gain passage to GB. And half of GB trying to move to Australia.

On a recent trip to England, I was horrified at the number and size of the Mosques encountered, every suburb has a mosque.

Islam is a leech on other cultures. It has been thru out history, this is a fact.
The only religion that builds its temples upon the rubble of others.

This country needs to stop it happening hear, get rid of them.

We need to get 'em all!

And by the Grace of God we will.....

What does the MEGA MOSQUE....stand for ?

PAEDOPHILIA ? I was once a defender of MOhammad against the charge "He was a paedophile" but as of today, I've changed to support that view. Muslim commentators have persuaded me.

I used to defend him as follows: "Technically, according to the Victorian crimes act.. he could never be any more than a child abuser"

Now..while this is true, because under the act, the crime is limited to pubescent children. Pre pubecent abuse is paedophilia.

Today, I discovered that:

a) The Quran 65:4
b) High ranking Muslim commentators.

All support the understanding of 65:4 as meaning TO ALLOW SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITH PRE-PUBESCENT GIRLS. (in marriage)

I recommend any try hard 'Oh..you Islamaphobe' propogandists, to check this web site and make SURE you reference the MUSLIM commentators.. and verify every syllable of this shocking truth.

http://islamreview.blogspot.com/2006/01/aisha-ayesha-child-wife-of-muhammad.html

These are one commentator's words

QUOTE
"Therefore, making mention of the waiting-period for the girls who have not yet menstruated, clearly proves that it is not only permissible to give away the girl in marriage at this age but it is also pemssible for the husband to consummate marriage with her. Now, obviously no Muslim has the right to forbid a thing which the Qur'an has held as permissible."
UNQOUTE

Who said that ? some obscure, self styled guru from the Middle ages?
No..
This is he: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abul_Ala_Maududi

"considered an influential Islamic thinker of the 20th century."

Then..there is this. Paradise..
http://www.altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=1&tTafsirNo=74&tSoraNo=36&tAyahNo=55&tDisplay=yes

You have to read this to believe it.. I won't post it.

CJ... PERICLES.. Does "Islam" according to it's own sources and commentators support Paedophilia or not ? Its a simple question.
Before you criticize me.. ANSWER IT..with a 'yes'...or 'no' and defend your answer.

Poor old Boazy - bestiality one day, paedophilia the next.

Is there any end to the projection of his sexual fantasies?

Ginx, I know that ‘WE ARE NOT BRITAIN; WE ARE AUSTRALIA’. I also know that most of what happens in Britain happens here a few years later. We are very similar (in fact, it almost appears that we are still a colony). Britain’s multiculturalism spilled over to here and, even though we can see their problems, most people will stick their head in the sand as we go down the same road. Also, you wrote ‘your intolerant hatred will breed the same’. Don’t you know that they already hate us? They have hated us for most of the previous century (and before that), even in the days when the western nations trusted most Moslem nations and gave numerous types of aid, these same nations were seething with resentment against the ‘infidel’. As for our part in a conflict, would you deny us the right of defence?

David, the movement is, indeed, race-based. So is the threat that it was created to combat. What I find strange is that you state that you are ‘scared....because it was 'race' based’ yet in the same post you advocate retaining a ‘a large anglo/celt/Northern European majority’ for Australia.
You have to decide what side of the fence you are going to sit on.