HRS have put it very well and if censors allow I want to add some more substance which is verifiable.
Perhaps the title of the subject should be “Will Rudd stop stealing generations?”.

Well, the current title is quite appropriate, it should be just the first step to stop legal crime against innocent children, their parents and society.

Taking children against the will of even one parent and without a good reason, is not in fact kidnapping and it is crime. When it has been legalised, it is legal crime like many dictators have done, nevertheless it is crime which must be stopped immediately and guilty charged for kidnapping. Family Law act of No Fault Divorce 1975 allow this legal crime.
http://niezmienny.googlepages.com/legaldestructionoffamilies - my webpage

I am not drawing anybody to my personal problems. I am using my personal tragedy in general terms to show the legal crime, the consequences of such politics and that it is against everybody in society.

Kevin Rudd have done the best I could imagine and there is a chance that he may take some extra steps.

Being quite ignorant in history prior to 1980s I only believe that aboriginal stolen generation issue was largely fueled by rasism. Continuation of stealing or kidnapping children cannot be categorised that way any more. Current problem is bit more complex. The higher the office one holds, the less responsibility one accepts. This can be attributed to immaturity and also to mean intent.
Definitely the commonly known lie that courts and government and UN care mainly and predominantly for the best interest of children is both illogical, cannot be truth and is against the facts.

What would happen to our families if all judges and lawyers were paid only for each saved family and nothing for each destroyed as is the case at present?
Legal industry as any other industry seek maximum benefit at minimal effort.
Who said that judges do not act in the best interest of their own children?