The Forum > Article Comments > The rise of secular religion > Comments
The rise of secular religion : Comments
By Peter Sellick, published 13/12/2006The truth may give us flat screen TVs but increasingly, as culture decays, there is less and less to watch.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Page 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- ...
- 28
- 29
- 30
-
- All
You had no case. Your assertion of god as your base requires you have knowledge of the god that you claim. To assert god to exist on any level requires an intimate knowledge of that god which only god could deliver in person with gods own undeniable proofs. That is that even if a god did appear he has to prove he is god. That god also has to prove all his claims are also true and then clarify them in no uncertain terms. Such intimate knowledge requires an in-depth exchange and experience of proof previous to your claim.
All you have done is make the same claims children make when they speak of pretend friends – ‘Don’t sit there you will sit on god’. Worst still you demonstrate you don’t even have understanding of your own prejudices. You are using the internet a product of science to say across a nation that ignorance and backwardness creates a better world than secularism. Even god can’t go further than the skull of the believer. Science trumps god again. Worst again you have to use untruths to push your case.
All along it is you speaking, speaking from the ego, that’s why you throw the tantrum. God has not disagreed with secularism; god is a no show, null and void. You are left just regurgitating your fantasies and horrifically expecting others to march to your dictates.