The Forum > Article Comments > The rise of secular religion > Comments
The rise of secular religion : Comments
By Peter Sellick, published 13/12/2006The truth may give us flat screen TVs but increasingly, as culture decays, there is less and less to watch.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Page 29
- 30
-
- All
Simple,
- I beleive in the basic tenents of the Ten Commandments and dozens of other commandments too, MYSELF. Love, compassion, civility and empathy, can stand alone.
- In early posts, I have mentioned Lawrence Kohlberg, whom measured morality. The OT players and two thousand years of the Church --with some exceprions, of course-- wouldrate quite low. The OT God torments its creation and the Medieval Church tortures people.
-- Crucifixation rates, as high maryterdom, but not a supreme sacrafice. Many people have died for their beliefs or been caught-up in political intrigue. For pure sacrafice and transfigutaion to work, Jesus can not be divine, he must loose base/touch with the godhead, true sacrafice. Moreover, the sacrafice would need to be universal not particular... no need for churches and atheists are saved.
-- If the supernatural communicates [I doubt it does.]. How do you know, it is not a prentender? A Satan would substitute the perceived grand for the perfect. Something it can sell.
-- Christianity [what became Christianity] is not differentited from its theistic contemporaries. It follows the same basic patterns and has the same components.
-- God would have infinite band width. Why churches?
What is it in Christianity than cannot be found in living a goog life ONE'S SELF? [ Except, afterlife, a concept predating Christianity by thousands of years. ]
Q: Was Jesus a carpenter in the Bible? [I really don't know. Have not seen it in print. Not a trick.] Thanks.