It's sort of reassuring to go away for few days and know that on one's return very little will have changed.

Bozo: "Multi-cultural=Multi-CLAN... each with it's own interests and agenda's"

Our resident amateur anthropologist once agains reveals the depth of his knowledge. Clans are groups of people who are linked together by common descent, and typically share the same culture. Our crusader may know his bible, but his understanding of culture and history are particularly poor, even by Aussie standards.

One can only wonder why he continues to post such utter claptrap for our entertainment. Mind you, "...just redneck racist ratbag retards raving" has a certain ring of truth to it, and nice alliteration.

Boaz_David,
Yesterdays Telegraph in London carries many stories about their PM dumping the policy of MULTICULTURALISM. Very worth a look.

I think the Libs here are going the same way and with a bit of luck the ALP will follow treir mates in UK

I hope you can bury the Multicultural coffin the day of your parade.

I realize there is a whole industry built up around MC, which absorbs millions of dollars each year. Those involved may well put up a fight. They have had cushy jobs for about 30 years.

Banjo
You should read what Blair actually said "It is not that we need to dispense with multicultural Britain. On the contrary we should continue celebrating it."

Steve Madden -Blair, "comform to our society". http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6219626.stm

Mr Blair said "multicultural Britain" should not be dispensed with, adding: "On the contrary, we should continue celebrating it,"

But, he said the suicide bombings in London on 7 July last year had thrown the whole concept of a multiculturalism "into sharp relief", the prime minister said. "The reason we are having this debate is not generalised extremism. It is a new and virulent form of ideology associated with a minority of our Muslim community.

"It is not a problem with Britons of Hindu, Afro-Caribbean, Chinese or Polish origin. Nor is it a problem with the majoirty of the Muslim community."
But he said there was a "problem with a minority of that community, particularly originating from certain countries".

The failure of that part of the community to integrate did not mean multiculturalism was dead, said Mr Blair, but it would be useful to define "common values" all citizens were "expected to conform to".

"When it comes to our essential values - belief in democracy, the rule of law, tolerance, equal treatment for all, respect for this country and its shared heritage - then that is where we come together, it is what we hold in common."

Mr Blair also said: "If you come here lawfully, we welcome you. If you are permitted to stay here permanently, you become an equal member of our community and become one of us.

"The right to be different, the duty to integrate: that is what being British means.

"And neither racists nor extremists should be allowed to destroy it.

I'm being lectured on about 'rationality' by WHOM??

OK - Show of hands. Stick 'em up high now all you 'other pro MC'-ers out there. Who feels like they are walking on a knife's edge? Come on... I want to see all those hands way up... Just as i thought, Obviously is spouting rubbish once more.

The man who does not 'now' what 'to and to' equals, what 'rode' he is travelling on and what the difference is between there and their.

Ageism sir, is a prejudice or discrimination against a particular age group, most frequently associated with the middle-aged to elderly groupings.

One could just barely apply it to your particular age group. Since you have already told us all you are 18, that makes you 'young' for the purposes of most posters, perhaps you meant 'youthism' or 'young adultism'?

Since i have nothing against the young as an age group and do not discriminate against them on that basis your statement concerning me once again is false and not even slightly rational.

I do discriminate against some of the stupid however, as i feel that is the biggest problem facing the world today. Stupid people who have not the slightest understanding of logic and so make ridiculous assumptions and conclusions from poorly understood observations and principles. Leading them to hatred and prejudice and the undying belief that they are 'right' and anyone who thinks differently is 'wrong' and so should have less of a say in how things are done than they.

Being stupid of itself is not a thing i naturally fight against (How ever could i find the time?). I fight it most strongly when it tries to tell other people who do not see the stupidity first off, and so become prone to following along with it, that it is 'rational' and 'logical' and 'just plain common sense' and worst of all... 'OBVIOUS' (great choice of nick there, sport)

So, you should've more correctly defined me as committing stupidism by chosing to discriminate against your insistance on explaining to all the good people here
(cont.)

just why your view is right and those who don't share your view are in the wrong, or just not able to see the 'obvious'.

For anyone who might have actually been reading Obviously for the first time in his last post here I would like to make clear something that is NOT 'obvious' to Obviously and that is... just because i make every effort to show his rantings for the ill-considered crap they are on this thread (and some others) that does not make me PRO MC. It makes me someone who does not believe that the ills people like Obviously and seemingly now Boaz and Banjo attribute to the 'policy' of MC (that appears to have incorrectly replaced the White Australia 'policy', if i understand those aforementioned people's complaints accurately?) are the sole logical consequence of an immigration policy that allows entry to this country of any colour creed or culture. (Under tight quota's of less than 1% per annum of our nations pop.)

'Mans (sic) greatest wars do not lie in our past but in our ever closer multicultural future.'

OK genius - show us the rationality that led to such unemotional logical deduction?

You might take a second to consider first that our wonderful technology now ensures that wars in remote asian countries are made to seem like they are happening right in our own lounge rooms or follow us around as closely as our TV-showing mobile phones do these days and that violence is the most guaranteed way of selling news programs, hence it's seeming never-ending prevelance in our current society.

So - go on - enlighten us with a description of the next big thing in war you see coming and what evidence other than your own 'obvious' visions of racial intollrance in Australia proves your statement to be even the slightest bit 'rational'??

I await your rebuttal.

(Someone please explain it to him before the prospect of a totally unwanted 'moon' rises upon these overburdened posts).