Hi Mirko Bagaric, Mercurius and all:

Here's the full transcript of the sick sheik's speech:

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20653032-601,00.html

Sheik says:

1) Those atheists, people of the book (Christians and Jews), where will they end up? In Surfers Paradise? On the Gold Coast?

"Where will they end up? In hell. And not part-time. For eternity. They are the worst in God's creation.

Any atheists/jews/christians.. please note that we are going to hell for eternity.

2) Who commits the crimes of theft? The man or the woman? The man. That's why the man was mentioned before the woman when it comes to theft because his responsibility is providing.

Wow.. what a logic.

3) "But when it comes to adultery, it's 90 per cent the women's responsibility. Why? Because a woman possesses the weapon of seduction. It is she who takes off her clothes, shortens them, flirts, puts on make-up and powder and takes to the streets, God protect us, dallying. It's she who shortens, raises and lowers. Then it's a look, then a smile, then a conversation, a greeting, then a conversation, then a date, then a meeting, then a crime, then Long Bay jail. (laughs).

"Then you get a judge, who has no mercy, and he gives you 65 years.

Weapon of Seduction? So, his wife, his sister, his daughter all have Weapons of Seduction..

In other words, he is referring to Sydney gang rapes... He seems to say that the Lebanese rapists noticed the Aussie girls who have lowered, raised their dresses and involved in a conversation and 'they' did a crime i.e rape.. And finally judge gave them 65 yrs jail sentence as punishment.

Note: He is referring to Aussie non-muslim women who were raped; not muslim women.

(contd

..

4) Woman compared to a kilo of meat

If you take a kilo of meat, and you don't put it in the fridge or in the pot or in the kitchen but you leave it on a plate in the backyard, and then you have a fight with the neighbour because his cats eat the meat, you're crazy. Isn't this true?

"If you take uncovered meat and put it on the street, on the pavement, in a garden, in a park or in the backyard, without a cover and the cats eat it, is it the fault of the cat or the uncovered meat? The uncovered meat is the problem.

"If the meat was covered, the cats wouldn't roam around it. If the meat is inside the fridge, they won't get it.

"If the meat was in the fridge and it (the cat) smelled it, it can bang its head as much as it wants, but it's no use.

So, women are meat and "WE" (males) have to keep them in Fridges. Fridges refer to Hijabs/Jijabs/Kababs etc..

So, the sheik instructs the Aussie non-muslim girls to be kept in "Fridges" lest Muslim male cats prey upon them.

Meow! Meow! Meow! Meow! Meow! Meow!

(contd.

Don't you love the spin that Mirko puts on it.The usual racist tags for white anglos who don't conform to his way of thinking.When Mirko has one of his children bashed or experiences the throb of his heart as he wonders if the snapped handle of the knife deeply embedded in his back will end his life,then maybe the taste of reality will sharpen his senses and cognitive powers.

Any one who has been indocrinated with religious hatred from and early age ,will not listen to any logic ,no matter how sweet the words that eminate from Mirko's mouth.There are a large portion of the Muslim community who think exactly like Sheik Hilali.It was revealled today that he won't be deposed because it will divide the Muslim community.Those at the Lakemba Mosque have revealled that there are many who think exactly like him.He wasn't taken out of context or mis-understood.He was caught out revealling his true self.

If the alarm bells weren't ringing before in Australia,there should be now a deafening din of outrage over the Sheik's degrading sexist and racial remarks.

Professor Bagaric

Nothing to do with prejudice. Everything to do with power and pride, for those who wear either. In the case of the veil, the power and pride of being better than thou in sexual "purity"--especially in a Western milieu--and the power and pride of being sexually attractive.

For the real issue of Hilaly see--http://www.con.observationdeck.org

Professor Bagaric

Nothing to do with prejudice. Everything to do with power and pride, for those who wear either. In the case of the veil, the power and pride of being better than thou in sexual "purity"--especially in a Western milieu--and in the case of the mini, the power and pride of being sexually attractive.

For the real issue of Hilaly see--http://www.con.observationdeck.org

"The fury that was sparked when a Sheik criticised the former is in sharp contrast to community approval questioning the appropriateness of the face veil. This reveals an underlying racist core in Australia."

And this guy runs a philosophy class - no really!

Does the author really believe that the outcry would be any different if the person making the remarks was a WASP?

Does he think that the outcry in this country would be any less if we found that the senior leader of the Anglican church came out publicly in support of the KKK?

It's not about race, it's about views which are in complete contradiction to values held strongly by most of the community.

It's about someone who appears to be very influential in his religious community expressing views which might help the gullible excuse the inexcusable.

I really don't give a rats about head coverings as long as those who were them support the rights of others to make their own clothing choices, perhaps they could sign Sylvia's petition on clothing optional beaches. I'm also left wondering why motorbike riders have to take off helmets in banks.

It's not about race, it's about views which are a threat to community safety.

R0bert