The Forum > Article Comments > Integration or disintegration: a test for immigrants > Comments
Integration or disintegration: a test for immigrants : Comments
By Bill Muehlenberg, published 22/9/2006Simple demands: they should have lived here for four years; they should know a bit about Australian history and values; and they should be able to speak English.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Page 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
-
- All
Bill Muehlenberg, if it is so important to Australia to only admit immigrants who pass the test, then how come Australia has worked as a social democracy for so long, and hasn't been dreadfully destabilised by the waves of untested immigrants who have swarmed in to build our Snowy Hydroelectric Schemes, fund our universities and run our fish and chip shops?
There is no practical purpose for the proposed tests except as a dog whistle to the xenophobic masses. Immigrants will just bone up on the test questions to get through. Some have even suggested that by relying on a test rather than putting money into English classes for migrants, that it might make the standard of English drop, because they will concentrate on getting through the test, rather than really learning English that can be used.
Ghassan Hage probably had the most sensible comment on this issue back on Monday, when he pointed out that all this would do would be to make the people who insist on it being done feel more Australian, and make immigrants feel ostracised. It's not about anything practical, because in reality it won't make a jot of difference.
Do people really think that spouting some rote-learned answers, like 'Vegemite', or 'Gallipoli', is really going to help people fit in culturally?