No, Rache. I'm from the "If it moves, shoot it, if it doesn't, chop it down." brigade.

But I don't want you and wendy to think I am entirely heartless, I must confess, I cry every time I pull the trigger.

Kvasir
Thankyou for your post. Yes u are correct. He can go to court with his chosen name and fight for Islam. Thats what he wanted even his dad said so. Redneck has a point about prisoners of war. Whats behind this left wing push is Anti West. As far as crying each time u pull the triger rN lets put it like this.

When the two Tasi guys were trapped down the mine we had one guy who could not wait! to get out to go hunting to kill unsuspecting innocent animals.
I mean hey wouldnt u think that being stuck there might make u respect life and re think.
The other guy Brad was rightfully sickend by Tods Calus disclosure being a kind guy who went straight home to his family when they got out.
So there is another example of breeding. You only had to glance at the idiot on 60 minutes with his Gun club t shirt[how distateful] Especially as 60 were paying.
That does not make Brad less of a man rN but more of a man.
The other guy [ tod] advertised That he had an IQ of about 0.

Thats genetic as well.

Getting a thrill from killing is about as low mentality as u can go.

The young soldiers who fought to save this country didnt go because it was fun to kill red neck.
They went to save drop kicks like u.
more the pity.
David hicks of course is another who I am told enjoys to kill animals and calls it sport.
See no matter what side these people are on they are still drop kicks.
Either way Mohamead as he calls himself is where he should b.

Locked up as a prisoner of war.

Sorry, Wendy, but you are wrong again.

The normal male human reaction to the act of killing an enemy is most commonly one of elation. For 85% of soldiers, this feeling of elation quickly transforms itself into one of depression caused by guilt. This overpowering sense of guilt usually results in a wave of suicides immediately after the cessation of hostilities.

To give you an idea of how bad this problem is, 62,500 US soldiers were killed in Vietnam. But in the twenty years following after the end of the war, an incredible 120,000 Vietnam vets committed suicide.

Over the last sixty years, armies all over the world have done a lot of reasearch into the pyschology of killing. They know that despite widespread male myths, most men are just not up to the task of killing anything higher than insects and fish. They also know that only 15% of men can kill other human beings without it affecting them psychologically, and that is why police officers are given immediate grief counseling if thay have to kill an offender in the course of their duty. Armies are now actively trying to find ways to identify and recruit these men.

No prizes for guessing which particular demographic group these men most commonly come from?

Remember Kipling.

"It's soldier this, and soldier that, and chuck him out, the brute.
But it's "savior of the country", when the guns begin to shoot."

Redneck. I can assure you my point was just that.
Many men go against their grain to survive A protect their loved ones family and country B.
So I agree with the 15 percent can kill without feeling guilty.
What I said was it took a certain type to want to shoot somebody in cold blood who could not defend themselves.
Its the same as enjoying killing animals.
you said killing animal was a lot of fun and u would walk on broken gless to shoot Hicks
I simply pointed out the connection.
Although I certainly would not loose any sleep over Hicks because unlike the poor animals Hes not innocent.
On that at least we agree
Good Evening red Neck.

Good evening, Wendy.

So, shooting human beings is OK, but shooting animals is not OK?

Hee hee hee.

I love debating with people who have Obsessive-Compulsive disorders. Their logic is a treasure.

Redneck

You seem unable to grasp the most simply debate.

I said anybody who thought it was fun to kill either people or animals was mentally ill.

You said killing animals was a lot of fun.

You made a similar remark about the 15 percent of soldiers you ! claim enjoy killing.

The point is anybody who enjoys killing anything either person or animal is a low life.
Taking a life is not something normal people enjoy and it should only be done if it is absolutlty neccesary not for fun. You expressed your wish to shoot Hicks in a fireing squad. To me thats extream. They already have him locked up.

So why the extra bullet from you? The only answer I can see is because as you said its fun to kill animals.

I simply pointed out the facts that there is a connection between low lifes who enjoy killing animals calling it sport with people who enjoy killing people.
You came along and said > I am one of the low lifes that think its fun to kill animals and I would like to kill Hicks Too.

The connection should be clear even to you.

I dont like Hicks but also dont agree with shooting him.
Leave him rot in goal.