The Forum > Article Comments > Defining David Hicks > Comments
Defining David Hicks : Comments
By Neil James, published 9/6/2006Releasing David Hicks is not as easy and straightforward as it seems.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Page 22
- 23
- 24
-
- All
Posted by Scout, Friday, 30 June 2006 6:45:17 AM
| |
What a brutal fouth reich we are a part of. The US Supreme Court has confirmed, step one: that we officially have been told lies, propaganda, misinformation, and that our Governments are in breach of UN conventions, US law, and the Geneva Conventions. George W Bush is now "alleged" a war criminal by his own Supreme Court by his dictatorship.
All reference to Hicks must use "allegation" now that law upholds democracy, as you are innocent before proven guilty in a court of law. Tidy up your language, the fourth reich may no longer be in control after today. The war on Afghanastan and Iraq was illegal from the start as it was illegal for Australia as a signatory to the UN Legal system, to invade a sovereign country that poses no threat to our sovereign country. There is an "allegation" from the Senate that John Howard is a war criminal. Now that it is fact that the US is in breach of the Geneva Conventions, and US Law, Guantanamo Bay itself is illegal. The pressure for a Presidential Impeachment begins. Bush's days are crumbling right this moment. This makes Watergate look like a wee drop compared to Supreme Court's desicision to "allege" that George W Bush in the same league as Saddam Huissein. A criminal. Posted by saintfletcher, Friday, 30 June 2006 8:43:15 AM
| |
David Hicks
left Australia to go fight!For Islam. He will be in court as a prisoner of war. Your stupid comments about Howard are so off beat that one might well wonder which tribe you have joined. Now as far as justise is concerned look no further than the world trade center and the the bombs much closer to home were 86 of our own were blown up.[ The murdering bastards who TARGET Citizens] The difference IS we have gone to the bother of trying NOT to hit citizens. The dirty filthy low life mongrels. The pigs! They rape women then stone them to death because they are no longer virgins. The F wits!. [ Ring any bells yet?] Perhaps you also support to bunch of low life garbage bastards who raped the girls in Sydney because they beleive its their right because of their backward culture. Something tells me your on center link too! PM if you are reading this . . Piss them all off! If I find Bin Larden before you do I will treat him the same as he has treated our prisoners of war!. Which is no court case torture and chop his head off. These are the rules of YOUR budies. David hick was one of them. Live by the sword and die by the sword. See u in the battle field. I will be the one not watching my langauge when it comes to that low life bunch and looking for you who supports them. The other thing is there stupid covering their faces and looking at you through two slits. For god sake they are all crazy. I think the PM should stop that in this country. We are Too tolerant. Its OUR country and we like it free of low lifes. They good ones can stay and the disloyal ones should go. I look forward to hiring a Santa for each street corner in Lakemba this year. Long Live The Queen Posted by Wendy Lewthwaite, Friday, 30 June 2006 9:33:03 AM
| |
Well, I wonder if anyone managed to read this far down through through the noise?
On the topic of terrorism MADE IN THE USA, for those who missed The Power of Nightmares (BBC), here is a little reminder of one of the cardinal facts: http://msnbc.msn.com/id/13600653/site/newsweek DO enjoy! Posted by Chris Shaw, Carisbrook 3464, Friday, 30 June 2006 10:56:42 AM
| |
Chris thanks
The other facts are the world trade center and other attacks on citizens Do enjoy Posted by Wendy Lewthwaite, Friday, 30 June 2006 1:52:58 PM
| |
Other facts hey Wendy? Then explain this:
1. Why are 7 of the 19 9/11 hijackers still alive and living normal lives? 2. Why was the world shown footage of Bin Laden conversing with his fellow terrorists about the 9/11 attacks faked? - Bin Laden wearing a gold ring, forbidden by Islamic law - Bin Laden writing with his right hand despite the FBIs website stating that he is left handed. - Bin Laden not even looking anything like himself. http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/osamatape.html 3. Why is it that the only video footage of the Pentagon strike we get to see is a time-lapse video that doesn’t show a plane hitting it, yet the Pentagon is surrounded by video cameras? If there’s no truth to the conspiracy theories then why don’t they just show all the other footage that shows a plane hitting the only wall built for to withstand that sort of impact (a handy coincidence)? 4. Why is it that we still haven’t seen the footage from the cameras from the rooftops of all the hotels surrounding the Pentagon that the plane would have passed over? Not to mention the cameras on the highways that the plane would have flown strait over? Why the need for all the secrecy? Posted by Jinx, Friday, 30 June 2006 10:29:04 PM
|
The US Supreme Court has ruled that the Bush administration does not have the authority to try terrorism suspects by military tribunal.
Justices upheld the challenge by Osama Bin Laden's ex-driver to his trial at Guantanamo, saying the proceedings violated Geneva Conventions.
Maybe now Hicks will get his day in court. Maybe now we can see justice be done.
Holding people indefinitely without trial is simply wrong. If rapists and murderers can receive a fair trial, an idiot like Hicks deserves no less.