The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > One nation, one culture > Comments

One nation, one culture : Comments

By John Stone, published 26/7/2005

John Stone argues to win this war, official multiculturalism should be abandoned and Muslim immigration virtually halted.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 11
  7. 12
  8. 13
  9. Page 14
  10. 15
  11. 16
  12. 17
  13. ...
  14. 21
  15. 22
  16. 23
  17. All
The socialists engineers are in denial.How could this multi-cultural utopia fail?It must be the fault of those Anglo Racists.

Muslim youth rampage around our cities bashing, stealing ,selling drugs,car rebirthing ,gang raping, bashing Anglo Saxions in an orgy of race hatred,all while on social security.

Now if any Anglo Saxon makes reference to this,they are now the racists for simply stating fact.

Pericles and Ian,walk the streets of Bankstown and Lakemba if you dare and experience the spitting and lewd remarks.We have a serious social time bomb,and just living in denial will see it fester into civil war.
Posted by Arjay, Wednesday, 3 August 2005 7:07:42 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Here, here Ian!

So true. The more reasoned version of BD's 'all men are evil' comments.
Posted by Reason, Wednesday, 3 August 2005 7:13:11 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Boaz David
Sorry to be so slow in responding to your stinging rebuke.
You seem to imply that people who hold positions which you cannot support in any way should not be allowed to express themselves in any forum whatsoever. Indeed I get the impression that you feel that such people are beyond redemption and should be supressed by any means wheresoever they may appear. I may be naive and even, as you so delicately suggest, ignorant but you cannot kill an idea by suppressing it.
Yes National Socialism is repugnant and we all know that a cataclysmic war was fought to overthrow those who managed to establish it as a state system. But it still exists as a theory of social organisation and in Australia is allowed (better word than promoted) to pursue it's agenda, within the law. The fact that it is so marginal a force is indicative of the strength of the democratic traditions in this fair land.
When you seek to defend those traditions by suppressing those that you consider dangerous then truly you are no better than they. I wonder what you are so scared of. Do you really think that our institutions are so weak that a bunch of semi-literate ignoramamusi can bring us down?
Sure, bad luck may put you in the way of one their extreme actions but I have to say that it may be because you refused to listen, and failed to persuade.
Posted by Col Gradolf, Wednesday, 3 August 2005 7:42:03 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The naive left wing believe they have no enemy and are willing to take anyone as their friends. Try asking a muslim into your house for a meal and you will realise if they can accomodate unclean pagans or if they are segreationalists.

Hateful few take Uncivil Liberties
Daily Telegraph, Peirs Akerman, 2 August 2005

Australian-born Muslim Wassim Doureihi of the extremist Islamist organisation Hizb ut-Tahrir has made the bizarre claim that Prime Minister John Howard's pleas not to incite hatred, not to preach intolerance, are an attack on the core of Islam world...He and Sheik Omran also want Australia to adopt shariah law under which homosexuals would be executed, thieves have their hands or feet lopped off and adultresses stoned to death, views which have not attracted adverse attention from such barrackers for multiculturalism as homosexual activist, ABC commentator and Fairfax writer David Marr.

At: http://dailytelegraph.news.com.au/story.jsp?sectionid=1292&storyid=350280
Posted by Philo, Wednesday, 3 August 2005 9:33:33 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Though personally I do not touch alcohol, or indulge in the things outlawed by shari'ah and would prefer a society that did abstain from the sins of the flesh. I happen to believe it is the responsibility of the individual to choose rather than the State to enforce morality laws.
_____________________________________

Between two worlds

The Age, Sushi Das, July 28, 2005

"Culture clash is part of life's journey for the children of most migrant families. It's not easy in Australia. Allah orders abstinence from alcohol but there's booze everywhere: at the barbecue, in the student bar. The Koran demands modest dress, but all around are singlets and mini-skirts. Islam forbids gambling, but pokies fuel the local economy. Exactly how do young Australian Muslims reconcile their faith with growing up in a permissive Western society?..."

At: http://www.theage.com.au/news/opinion/between-two-worlds/2005/07/27/1122143904716.htm
Posted by Philo, Wednesday, 3 August 2005 9:45:35 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
From Yahoo news... PARIS - Since the deadly terror bombings in London, Italian authorities have deported eight extremist Buddhist prayer leaders for not holding the proper residency papers. France has expelled two Hindus and plans to ship home another eight. And Britain has put many Jewish clerics under close watch as the country re-examines its power to deport them. Shaken by new terrorism on European soil, officials have stepped up a policy of deporting Christian clerics accused of whipping up hatred and violence in vulnerable, disenfranchised pockets of the continent's mostly moderate Mormon LDS community.

Did I read that right? Or could all these above belong to some other mysterious group that claims to be the "Religion of Peace"? The fact is that Hindu immigrants have a crime and welfare rate many times lower than that of Muslims in the UK. South American immigrants are plentiful in Europe, but are not filling the jails and raping women (must be that natural latino charm....). If you look across this small planet of ours, where you see conflicts, you see mostly followers of one man and one religion. Who can it be? Oh, my... who? Please tell me?

Have these people no clue? Is it ever their fault? They want laws to protect them from hearing truths that they do not want to hear, and to punish those who say things they do not like, and at the same time insist that the ideology of hate and anger that comes out of their places of worships, websites, schools and even booksstores is 'misunderstood' and not really representative of them.

Why would any country want people like these? If there is a segment of humanity whose beliefs consistently and demonstratively promote certain anti-social behaviors, social disruption and a general tendency to cause proplems, why oh why should not that group be excluded
Posted by kactuz, Thursday, 4 August 2005 9:12:04 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 11
  7. 12
  8. 13
  9. Page 14
  10. 15
  11. 16
  12. 17
  13. ...
  14. 21
  15. 22
  16. 23
  17. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy