The Forum > Article Comments > I hate Nicole Kidman > Comments
I hate Nicole Kidman : Comments
By Adriana Maxwell, published 10/1/2005Adrianna Maxwell explains why she hates Nicole Kidman
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 87
- 88
- 89
- Page 90
- 91
- 92
- 93
- ...
- 118
- 119
- 120
-
- All
Posted by WAKINGS, Sunday, 1 July 2007 9:58:42 AM
| |
Well, I'd look to see when her next "big summer blockbuster" Invasion comes out and fails, it would be interesting to see what she gets. As for her recent independant films, shes 0 for 3, and shes 0 for 2 on the blockbusters... soon to be 3. Must be why she's now getting into producing... she "produced" something called In the Cut, with meg ryan. it came out on the same day as kidmans human stain, it grossed only 4 million itself, and Ive read she has something in development now. I'd say she has meg ryans future in store for her very soon, as lip collagen injections didn't help ryan very much with her career either.
Posted by MACLEN, Monday, 2 July 2007 12:38:23 PM
| |
Have y'all seen this. I have to scratch my head and wonder why? I swear that woman gives me a rash....
Nicole Kidman holds the honour of Hollywood's best-paid actress, commanding $18 million per role and moving from third into second place in the list after her earnings increased from $22.3 million in 2005 to $35 million. Her country crooner husband Keith Urban also had a bumper year. His earnings increased from $20 million to $26 million. After disappointing earnings in 2005 Russell Crowe's income dropped from $27 million to $5 million in last year's list, but the Cinderella Man has climbed back into the top 10 this year, making an estimated $15 million. But Hugh Jackman remains Australia's highest-paid male star at $30 million, a $10 million jump on the previous year. TOP ENTERTAINERS 1. The Wiggles $50 million (I still get a perverted pleasure knowing that NK can't beat the wiggles.) 2. Nicole Kidman $35 million 3. Hugh Jackman $30 million 4. Kylie Minogue $27 million 5. Keith Urban $26 million 6. AC/DC $18 million 7. Cate Blanchett $18 million 8. Hi-5 $16 million 9. James Wan and Leigh Whannell (Creators of the Saw franchise) $15 million 10. Russell Crowe $15 million (Gross income 2006-07) http://www.smh.com.au/news/people/a-wobble...4559786837.html Posted by banbotox, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 11:08:38 AM
| |
Well banbotox, there's no way shes worth that much, whether its true or not.
banbotox, you'll love this!...go here: http://mizshowbiz.com/2007/07/18/nicole-kidman-and-hubby-feeling-a-chill/ ...this is what begins to happen when you start over doing the botox and collogen injections... you do start to look like melanie griffith... or like these specific photos, your face becomes frozen in a "Joker from gotham city" grin. I cant believe heath ledger beat her out for the next Batman movie.. Posted by MACLEN, Thursday, 19 July 2007 10:42:15 AM
| |
Ewww maclen! I can't believe that she looks into a mirror and likes what she sees in her reflection. It's freakish. I wonder if she scares small animals and children when they look at her?
Posted by banbotox, Thursday, 19 July 2007 11:37:04 AM
| |
You may have gathered from my past postings that I have never found her attractive as a woman, but those photos are fugly. What is she thinking?? Who is telling her she needs to do it?? Does KU really like what he sees?? Those puffy eyelids! Those bloated cheek bones! Those inflated lips! The arched eyebrows! (And I wont even go near the hair and forehead). It is all truly macabre.
At least I don't have to wake up with her beside me!! Posted by nomad48au, Thursday, 19 July 2007 2:04:12 PM
|
Lets not forget NK is getting a supposively reduced salary to do this movie. Did she not do this for Birth as well? So I think she just accepts anything that comes her way and hopes it will do well and ultimately keep her in the limelight.