The Forum > Article Comments > I hate Nicole Kidman > Comments
I hate Nicole Kidman : Comments
By Adriana Maxwell, published 10/1/2005Adrianna Maxwell explains why she hates Nicole Kidman
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 98
- 99
- 100
- Page 101
- 102
- 103
- 104
- ...
- 118
- 119
- 120
-
- All
Banbotox, morgan, I'm sure she can just as easily claim either one was this "mystery engagement". As you say, both being short lived and both those dudes pretty much long out of the celeb scene, is anyone really going to try very hard to get their side of the story for any much longer? Well, about that copycat "suri in the jacket" photo she took with the sis's kid, not much buzz generated, I only noticed one place, TMZ I think, that even mentioned the similarity. So realistically, this does not even come close to the suri cruise Vanity Fair issue for attention, considering that that issue was how many months in anticipation? From her birth, to all the questions of "Where's suri?" "When will we see Suri?" Kidmans issue is already pretty much dead in a few days of news cycles.
Posted by MACLEN, Saturday, 8 September 2007 2:42:07 PM
| |
Hello all. I thought you might enjoy these three articles about the Washed Up Washed Out One. I sure did! It seems like the media isn't liking her so much :-)
http://mhutch.blogspot.com/2007/09/keith-urbans-wife-nicole-secret-past.html http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,22383778-5000117,00.html http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,22380098-5001031,00.html Cheers! Posted by Urban Myths, Sunday, 9 September 2007 7:35:58 AM
| |
Ahhh yet another one:
http://www.hecklerspray.com/nicole-kidman-dresses-like-a-sailor-discusses-miscarriage/20079936.php#more-9936 Posted by Urban Myths, Sunday, 9 September 2007 1:31:02 PM
| |
Those are hilarious, Urban Myths... not everyone is impressed with these so call revelations. Well, it seems pretty clear doesnt it? She would like it to be very clear to the public that she truly, really, desperately wants to have a baby... but since urban is in no hurry, but... its only because of romance, he wants her all to himself, for years and years... (people, please try not to hurl!) So she will be forced to suffer and wait... good point, until shes about 44 or 45?
And, boy, imagine what she'd do if the tomkat decided to have another kid? Should we next expect a nude spread in Playboy, and the revelation that she was molested as a child? Stay tuned.... hilarity expected! Posted by MACLEN, Sunday, 9 September 2007 1:59:50 PM
| |
Thanks Urban Myths. I had already read Robin Riley's article and taken my hat off to her. At least one Australian journalist not bedazzled by the spin doctor who has been conning Australian journalists for years with her ridiculous facade.
Posted by morgan, Sunday, 9 September 2007 2:15:08 PM
| |
This is introducing another line of thought, but what do you think about the fact that her next movie involves her being involved with a 15 year old boy...on top of the subject matter of older woman seduces children/young teenagers of her other recent movies, e.g.Birth?
Why is she gravitating toward paedophilia in her movie choices? No wonder Deborah Lee Furness, Rebecca Rigg and Naomi Watts, all dedicated mothers, are creating polite distances from their former Aussie mate. (And just out of curiosity, where ARE you Tony-In-Toronto?) Posted by morgan, Sunday, 9 September 2007 2:30:39 PM
|