Killarney:

You are beginning to sound rather bitter now. Anger might be reasonable but bitterness is not. You are nit-picking and trawling far and wide to find evidence of man’s inhumanity to women but what of women’s inhumanity to other women?

I asked you why women continue to throw themselves into domestic relationships when there is an avowed epidemic of domestic violence taking place right now. You avoided the question but instead tried to attack me under the pretence of defending EmperorJulian.

If you really care about women you will want to understand what it is that propels them into such dangerous situations. You will be looking for answers so you can help them to stop doing it. It seems though that you are not as concerned about the plight of women as you are about maintaining your rage against men.

phanto

I acknowledged Emperor Julian provoked you, so put that Munchhausen-by-proxy argument to bed. You both resorted to psychobabble to accuse the other of having latent violent yearnings within your deep psyches. People are allowed to voice opinions about any form of violence without being told they are supposedly defending violence because they are violent criminals at heart. That goes for you and anyone else on this forum.

As for the rest of your comment, I am routinely accused on OLO of being bitter, man-hating and full of rage (yawn) - my record being six 350-word posts in a row from one commenter, interrupted only by the OLO daily limit. If it had the effect of silencing me, I wouldn't be here. So why don't you just stick to arguments, instead of psychobabble ad hominems?

So far, you haven't given any substantial arguments to prove 'women's inhumanity to other women'. The only 'evidence' on which you base your claim over and over again - i.e. that one in three marriages are violent - is demonstrably false.

So come up with some substantial arguments and perhaps this supposed bitter, angry, man-hating commenter might actually engage with you on some reasonable, rational level.

I think it's fairly easy to ascertain that the feminist government in Sweden has policies which lead to the rape and sexual assault of hundreds of women and children.

They aren't helping women, they're 'useful idiots' helping George Soros with his Open Borders and currency trading ideologies.
Crapping in their own and everyone's else backyard to make foreign elites richer.

Hi AC,

Hmmm ...... that's perhaps a stretch: a government with a relatively high proportion of women ministers leads to an increase in rape statistics ? I suggest that we suspend belief until reliable statistics can be provided to demonstrate this.

It shouldn't be that difficult: Sweden has had predominantly-male, even all-male Cabinets over the years, and now has one with a high proportion of women. Stats can easily be found to contrast the two situations. Good luck, AC.

Cheers,

Joe

//Hmmm ...... that's perhaps a stretch: a government with a relatively high proportion of women ministers leads to an increase in rape statistics ? I suggest that we suspend belief until reliable statistics can be provided to demonstrate this.//

I concur, Joe. And any consideration of rape statistics from Sweden must take into account that they reformed their sex crime laws in 2005, and widened the definition of rape considerably. Part of the reason Julian Assange is hiding like a rat in a hole. With the broadening of the definition, the numbers of people convicted of rape unsurprisingly went up.

Hi Toni,

I don't know, I think rats are much maligned and very under-valued.

Joe