The Forum > Article Comments > Saving democracy from the extremists > Comments
Saving democracy from the extremists : Comments
By Junaid Cheema, published 25/2/2015The publication had a very un-Australian affect on the readers - comments flooded the paper's social media site vilifying Muslims, promoting hate and creating divisions amongst Australians.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Page 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- ...
- 39
- 40
- 41
-
- All
I'm just trying to understand exactly what is meant by "Persecution, Oppressed & State of War," according to the Koran & Hadith.
8:39- And fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is all for Allah. But if they cease, then lo! Allah is Seer of what they do.[Translation Pickthal]
N.C: 2. Your source omits the part of verse which holds real significance to the point in issue. ‘But if they cease’, tells an average intelligence that the authorisation is to resist the force by force and must be end as soon as the aggression ‘ceases’.
By Persecution does that mean anything that moslems declare as persecution to Islam. E.g.:
Refusal to be allowed to build a Mosque,
Refusal to move a Pig farm after a Mosque is build on the neighbouring land,
Refusing to grant a special day for moslems & screen off an area for moslem women at the Local Swimming Pool,
Refusal to put a screen around the Local Pool because the sight of so many naked bodies is offensive to moslems.
Refusing to pay to have a food declared Halal.
Declaring that the Burka or other such women's clothing inhumane.
Declaring that Sharia Law is forbidden.
Declaring that a moslem can only have one wife.
& many, many more are considered to be persecution of moslems. Therefore they have the right to "defend" themselves or fight the unbelievers by killing innocent unbelieving civilians anywhere in the World. E.g., Lindt Café. The Policeman in Victoria, ect, ect.
So If moslems are refused any of these things then that means that unbeleivers have declared War on Islam & moslems.? Is that correct?
Cont>