...Cont

When coming across these revelations on Jews, I actually threw up a few times. Oh my God, what they did to Russia. A very sad history indeed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_II_of_Russia
Greatest Russian reformer since Peter the Great assassinated by Jews (Russian Left Wing Terrorists) after 7 attempts. See Jewess, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikolai_Rysakov

And you know what the Russian royal family represented don’t you? The (Holy) family. And that is how any monarchy is highly symbolic in Christianity. Only recently realised this. Peter Vexatious might have lead me there.

Looks like they were probably also involved with the Kennedy assassinations. And what were the Kennedy's called - yes, America’s royal family. Just speculating.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justinas_Pranaitis
Disputations
Authority of Pope Gregory IX
In 1238 Donin went to Rome, presented himself before Pope Gregory IX, and denounced the Talmud. Thirty-five articles were drawn up, in which Donin stated his charges of virulent attacks on the Virginity of Mary and the divinity of Jesus.

The Pope was persuaded that the accusations were true and dispatched to the authorities of the Church, transcripts of the charges formulated by Donin, accompanied by an order to seize all copies of the Talmud and deposit them with the Dominicans and Franciscans. If an examination corroborated the charges of Donin, the scrolls were to be burned.

Authority of King Louis IX
This order was generally ignored, except in France, where the Jews were compelled under pain of death to surrender their Talmuds (March, 1240). Louis IX ordered four of the most distinguished rabbis of France -- Yechiel of Paris, Moses of Coucy, Judah of Melun, and Samuel ben Solomon of Château-Thierry—to answer Donin in a public debate. In vain, however, did the rabbis argue against the charges of blasphemy and immorality which were the main points of Donin's arraignment. The commission condemned the Talmud to be burned. In 1242, fire was set accordingly to twenty-four carriage loads (ten to twelve-thousand volumes) of written works.

Cont...

...Cont

Yes, Joe, you implied once that you weren't interested in history. And isn't that one of the ideas of Marxism - to reinvent and ignore the past. Sorry, I beg to differ.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_IX_of_France
Louis IX was also a reformer and developed French royal justice, in which the king is the supreme judge to whom anyone is able to appeal to seek the amendment of a judgment. He banned trials by ordeal, tried to prevent private wars that were plaguing the country and introduced the presumption of innocence in criminal procedure. To enforce the correct application of this new legal system, Louis IX created provosts and bailiffs.

A devout Catholic, he is the only canonized king of France. Consequently, there are many places named after him.
Patron of arts and arbiter of Europe

In addition to Louis' legislation against Jews and usury, he expanded the scope of the Inquisition in France. The area most affected by this expansion was southern France where the Cathar heresy had been strongest. The rate of these confiscations reached its highest levels in the years before his first crusade, and slowed upon his return to France in 1254.

He is honoured as co-patron of the Third Order of St. Francis, which claims him as a member of the Order. Even in childhood, his compassion for the poor and suffering people had been obvious to all who knew him and when he became king, over a hundred poor people ate in his house on ordinary days. Often the king served these guests himself. Such acts of charity, coupled with Louis' devout religious practices, gave rise to the legend that he joined the Third Order of St. Francis. Though it is unlikely that Louis did join the order, his life and actions proclaimed him one of them in spirit.

Cont...

....Cont

During the so-called "golden century of Saint Louis", the kingdom of France was at its height in Europe, both politically and economically. Saint Louis was regarded as "primus inter pares", first among equals, among the kings and rulers of the continent. He commanded the largest army and ruled the largest and wealthiest kingdom, the European centre of arts and intellectual thought at the time. The foundations for the famous college of theology later known as the Sorbonne were laid in Paris about the year 1257. The prestige and respect felt in Europe for King Louis IX were due more to the attraction that his benevolent personality created rather than to military domination. For his contemporaries, he was the quintessential example of the Christian prince and embodied the whole of Christendom in his person. His reputation for saintliness and fairness was already well established while he was alive, and on many occasions he was chosen as an arbiter in quarrels among the rulers of Europe.

Hi Constance,

No, I've never said I'm not interested in history, quite the reverse, to the point of obsession :) I'm a follower of Popper's notions against historical inevitability (therefore I'm against Marx's notion of the reverse), and I'm currently working my way through Braudel's History of Civilizations, and an inspiring book by Marc Bloch (I'm reading it on the bus). They straddle the entire Middle Ages and up to the Enlightenment, and do it brilliantly. Where are the historians of yesteryear ?

I'm into processes and underlying forces, rather than events. So I find the times and innovations from Louis the Pouis to Saint Louis and the Renaissance are fascinating. If I had my time again, I would want to be a historian like those Annalistes :)

Joe

Constance it is a pity present day Royalis didn't copy Louis 1X in his work for the poor,, they are more interested in self appointed titles,or Abbott's, living off the taxpayer for their every whim to live in the life that they feel they should have.

Hi Joe,

You haven’t answered or acknowledged me only the bit on your interest in history. You’re not giving me the goods.

Do you really believe in freedom, Joe?

I want to highlight the Jewish influence in Freemasonry.

In some other of my recent posts on other threads, I have brought up The French and Mexican revolutions caused by the collaborations between Communists and Freemasons against the Catholic Church.

And funny, the same collaborators caused the Spanish Civil War.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popular_Front_(Spain)
Manuel Azaña was a Freemason.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuel_Aza%C3%B1a

Do you see a pattern here, Joe? Do you care?

John Calvin, the Protestant reformer had Jewish heritage. He and his father had both been Ex-Communicated from the CC.

Indeed, they have caused much distress and havoc in this world. I would say more than anyone else.

I also would like to mention another Jew who I greatly admire, Theodore Dalrymple. He is the George Orwell of today, even a bit of Graeme Greene due to his extensive travel and insights. Theodore’s father was a Communist, so he knows how satanic Communism is. Even as an Atheist (normal atheist that is) he believes that the West must return to its old traditions and religion. Orwell said the same.

So, looks like what it all boils down to is the Jews do not like Catholics, hey? Or the Russian Orthodox Christians. They’d probably go for the Greeks as well, given the chance. Probably have. They just couldn’t settle for Jesus being the greatest social reformer of all time, could they?

But they’ve been at it for quite a while, hey?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Jewish%E2%80%93Roman_War

John F Kennedy wanted to break the power of the US Federal Reserve by introducing silver Dollars. The supreme managers of the Fed are all apparently all Jews. Fancy that. The famous footage of the assassination was filmed by a Jew called Zapruder. Coincidence. There is also a Masonic symbol on the US dollar with the pyramid and eye. And Robert Kennedy taking the Mafia on? Um, just speculating again?

I’ve stayed with Jews in New York a few times. Lovely people.

But..

Cont.....