This could be the most significant terrorist attack since 9/11. The target of the attack was a left wing satirical newspaper. Lefties everywhere who have previously rushed to the defence of Islam, because doing so was sticking it to the Establishment, are now feeling like Christian Scientists with appendicitis.

The Dutch lefties and homosexuals may have woken up to the threat of Islam after the assassinations of Theo van Gogh and Pym Portyn, but the rest of our Internationalist comrades are still in denial. And that includes the author of this article, who is still pushing the line that most Muslims do not support the terrorists who fight against the west. He even goes so far as to claim that those who oppose Islamic immigration are just as bad as the Muslim terrorists themselves.

This author can't get it through his head that now that Nazism and Communism have been crushed, Islam has become the new contender for world domination against the secular democracies. The real villains are the Islamic mullahs of every shade of Islam, who seriously think that the time has come for Islam to rule the world. They know that time is against them, because their ignorant followers are being daily reminded of the failure of Islam to give them a better life. Muslims everywhere know that their own lifestyles simply do not compare with the prosperity and personnel freedoms in the non Muslim, western oriented world. The Mullahs need to move now before their brain washed followers start thinking, and they run out of oil. The Mullahs fully intend to use their own indoctrinated youth in western countries that we have foolishly imported, to get the point across that non Muslims will submit to their value systems, or else.

The point they are getting across with the Paris attack, is that we will not criticise, satirise, or question their religion at all. But this author is still mired in his multicultural utopian world, that he will never see that his civilisation is under attack from Islam, until a jihadi sticks an AK 47 in his face.

Jay
Yes I agree. I was only joking.

A French government Intelligence offical said; "We are at war !"
A bit late it started 1400 years ago !
I have believed that for some time and agree with Rhosty, it is now
time to apply the rules of war.
In time of war a nation is at war with another nation.
The nature of war has been changed by the Islamist forces in that they do not,
until recently, act as the forces of a particular nation.
They have recently established a country known as a caliphate with the name Islamic State.

Various groups giving allegiance to one another and IS are the new
belligerent force with whom we are engaged.
Western countries must officially declare war on IS and its aligned forces.
Then we can intern all those we believe maybe a threat or give them
the option of repatriation as POWs.
Those not thought to be a threat can be interned or offered repatriation
to enemy countries of choice as enemy aliens.
An alternative might be to find an island to which they can be deported
and become a protectorate of Australia. It might not be
possible to find a large enough Island.

Now I know certain people who inhabit this space will be LOL at my
suggestions, but I would draw their attention that the above
suggestions are perfectly normal in time of war.

Anyone opposing such actions is aiding the enemy.
A court could in time of war consider that opposition as treason.

LEGO,

I find it hard to understand too. I mean how many terrorist attacks does it take before people get it through their thick heads that they don't like us, our culture or our way of life.

The fact that only a minority of muslims are terrorists is mute. Terrorists can't survive if they can't hide in a sympathetic population. If muslims want to be accepted by the west then it is up to them root out and eliminate terrorism.

Why would we import people who don't even like us?

I'm devastated by this senseless violence and loss of life of those whose mission was to lampoon and expose the evil and lies represented not just by religious extremists, but by politicians, corporations and 'leaders' from all nations.
The rhetorical tragedy is that extremist groups make no 'coherent' critique of the West, and thus our leaders are able to pass off our 'freedoms', and 'way of life' as above reproach, to represent us as the opposite of evil. The baddies make us look good.

Squeers,
If you think the Islamist critique of Liberalism is incoherent it's probably because you've been getting second hand, heavily edited versions of Islamic sermons and articles.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8kBSPdCtQc

On Charlie Hebdo and Islamophobia
http://therightstuff.biz/2015/01/08/on-charlie-hebdo-and-islamophobia/#more-12766
Great last paragraph, I too can understand why the Muslim warrior calmly walked up to a wounded, surrendering Gendarme and blew his brains out but I can't fathom the mindset of Leftists and Liberals who pretend to be more afraid of the FN, PEGIDA or Bloc Identitaire than of gun toting Muslims. Pride perhaps? Low self esteem?