If Islam was a therapeutic good it would have been removed from the market long ago.

I tend to disagree with the Author's view, inasmuch as he seems to resist any action against the Islamification of the, traditionally Christian host countries, which are indubitably under the threat of Islamic inspired terrorism!

And makes almost as much sense as pre war Britannia saying, we must maintain an open door policy towards the Germans, even if a few of them are hostile Nazis/fifth columnists.

For mine, we need a better system of vetting these people, to isolate and expose the murderous criminal filth, hiding in their midst.

Let see how these Islamic heroes fare, when they test their mettle against armed professional soldiers; returning fire with interest!

I mean, these craven cowards, traditionally cower behind their own civilian populations, even as they maintain their war on the infidels!

If we are in a real war, shouldn't the enemy aliens, [even second or third generation,] be interred for the duration, least we have endless repetitions of these very events.

Why is there this endless reluctance to reexamine who we have allowed among us; and who are ideologically opposed to almost everything we believe in, including democracy and personal freedom!

And may mark themselves as such by refusing to vote; and or, advocate the same course of action for everyone else?

There is only one way to restore our security, and that is borne out in the Northern Island example, where every door was knocked on and every unlicensed weapon removed, along with their owners!

And we must get past this seeming official reluctance to use space age technology to expose those who shelter among us, and desire with every fibre of their being, to harm us or wipe us off of the face of the planet!

We should be concerned at possibly offending them? Really?

For mine I'd deport or inter, wherever possible, every suspect one of them!
You wouldn't allow a savage dog to roam the streets, would you?

As history proves, there is no way to appease madmen who want to conquer/rule the world!

But instead, must be eliminated with extreme prejudice; as rapidly as possible!
Rhrosty.

thanks for demonstrating my point plantagenet

To equate Islamic hate and violence (termed “facism” by the author) with the nonviolent protests of people peacefully proclaiming their apprehension about the hostility and brutality Muslims are bringing to the West (the other ‘facism’, according to the article) is outrageous.

The only people here with “selective views” of past and present are Muslims. They are the ones that pretend that the Quran is not full of hate and violence. They are the ones that consider a man who attacked his neighbors dozens and dozens and dozens and dozens of times to be a great moral example., even though he committed all kinds of atrocities (just like today in Paris)

The only facism here is Islam, a dogma that teaches hate and violence against non-Muslims (you know, those “lower than animal” infidels, according to the Quran). The facts are simple: Muslims cannot, will not, live in peace, in numbers, with non-Muslims. Our leaders betray us. The future will not be nice

Ok, for the 512th time I'll explain that Islamists like Al Nusra and Daesh are ANTI FASCIST groups.
Bashar Al Assad = A Fascist.
Abu-Bakr Al Baghdadi= An Anti Fascist.

Assad the elder was affiliated with Syrian National Socialists like Antunin Saadin and Al-hizb, Al-suri (SSNP), the SSNP still holds seats in the Syrian parliament.
You could call Ghadaffi a Fascist, the Lebanese Falange are a fascist group, Saddam Hussein was a Fascist to be sure but Islamism is the exact opposite of all those people stood for.
Therte's a tactic common to all Anti Fascists , be they Anarchists, Trotskyites, Zionists or Islamists they put most of their energy into vioplently shutting down free speech by those they label as "Fascists".
You can see Anti Fascists in action here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qS_q6RG6CR4

Runner,
Yeah it is sad isn't it, the 1968 generation should herewith die of shame, if they haven't already.
What would Che do? Rhetorical question, we know what Che would have done, the Seine would be running red with blood by now if Commies were still Commies.