LEGO the elites right throughout history have always conspired for unfair advantage. What do you think many of our Shakespearian plays are about?

The evidence is there for all to see.
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/
http://www.globalresearch.ca/
http://www.ae911truth.org/
http://www.patriotsquestion911.org/

Hi David Chibo,

For a Conspiracy Theory to exist there needs to be a void. Missing, undiscovered, badly researched information or information sourced only from a self referential network, the latter being borrowed or adopted opinion of another. (Like CT Web sites)

If you have a Tutor assigned for your thesis and I suspect you have, you need to review with them the basis for your research and investigation processes and techniques. I can recommend Kepner Trego, Entity Relationship Analysis, BPE, Enterprise Mapping and the age old hypothesis, test and repeat as an iterative process.

Your adoption of the opinions of others via CT web sites is not a substitute for critical thinking, research or analysis, which I might add are prerequisites for any University Education.

If you would like an example just read your responses here on OLO.

When challenged to think for yourself and offer a rational explanation, the only thing you have done here is offer us more and more of your borrowed opinions.

This a very serious flaw in your thinking or lack thereof. It is a pre cursor to illness.

Much analysis into explanations of CT have resulted in scholars concluding that conspiracy theories have chiefly psychological or socio-political origins. Proposed psychological origins include projection; the personal need to explain “a significant event [with] a significant cause;" and the product of various kinds and stages of thought disorder, such as paranoid disposition, ranging in severity to diagnosable mental illnesses.

In looking at your response to the evidence I offered you agreed with me, then immediately withdrew into your CT that it is all the fault of the USA?

Is this a fine example of thought disorder or what?

In accepting and acknowledging the evidence I offered, you demolished your own theory without even noticing, then went back to your CT.

I would embrace the opportunity to assist you in developing your absent skills, I would love to debate the issue of the USA with you and I would love to hear some original thoughts from David Chibo.

So please, no more CT Web sites, OK?

Hi David Chibo,

By way of further explanation for your condition, I draw your attention to the scholarly analysis by experts when they suggest one of the causes of CT is “the personal need to explain “a significant event [with] a significant cause;"

I’m sure that your and your family’s experiences and history are tragic, this is very sad I and don’t wish such experiences on anyone however, I trust that you can now understand that your need to reconcile such events sits exactly within the CT assessment criteria that of “the personal need to explain “a significant event [with] a significant cause". In effect a trauma event.

Your posts are riddled with the irrational assertions that those who engage with you on OLO are part of your conspiracy.

I doubt that many posters on OLO are involved in paid publications? It is possible but I’m not aware of any. You keep referring to “Team Leaders”, “Jedi mind tricks”, Think Tanks affiliated with international right wing think tanks, “CIA death squads”, that OLO posters have “bosses”, and that our “totalitarianism shines through”.

These references are characterized as “paranoid disposition”. Attribute number two. Check!

Delusions of grandeur. “My editor Graham and I”. Check!

Confusion and contradiction, “It IS CIA agitated Islam that is to blame for the such extremists. Isn't it surprising that these extremists are only targeting the Shiite crescent that resists paying petrodollar tribute such as Iran, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon”?

But didn’t you just write your agreement when I posted “The common denominators are not the USA, Bankers or the CIA. The only common element is Islam”. You said “correct again”?

You are not in great shape David. I can be very sorry for your circumstances but you need professional help.

Hi Spinner, seems you're up to your neck in advising other posters to get "professional help"" ...again, & again & again. Along with your myriad 'management degrees', 'qualifications in business', 'experience' ad nauseum you evidently gained some valuable knowledge about the universe and all things psycho-babble.

Maybe it's you who is the CIA stooge...any connections to our friend Dr Rebecca Peters by any stretch ?

C'mon mate we're all here to express an opinion, & denigration by association with mental illness is the first ploy.

Please I'd love to see your qualifications on diagnoses of the neuroses etc you have accused other posters of...?

Keep up the good work... the creeping fascists love your stuff !

He calls himself Spindoc for a good reason. The Doctor if Spin cannot address the truth by name and nature.

The Private US Federal Reserve took control of the US economy back in 1913.Initially Congress did have some control of it but the power of money creation so saw the USA totally controlled as it is today by a corporate culture that should have been allowed to go broke in 2007.

Instead they were allowed to create debt from nothing and produce gigantic bubble just waiting to destroy the world's economies. This is why the BRICS nations were formed and why the Western Banking Oligarchs want war with Russia and China. Our insolvent system only has weapons of mass destruction to redeem their failed New World Order Empire.

Spindoc ,try presenting some truth and facts to back up your flawed arguments. You could start with explaining the collapse of the 911 Towers and WTC7 which defied the laws of physics,coming down at nearly freefall speeds.

You and your corporate funded bosses are just upset that even we the Christian Middle Easterners see through your divide and conquer conspiracy theories and have now had enough of your repeated invasions of the Middle east. And you spindoc seem to have become very agitated at this thought.
No one takes it this personally unless they profit from it. And it is becoming glaringly obvious that the only thing you are trying to do is agitate me and to anger me so that readers ignore my main points made in the article.
So please deal with the root of my argument. Is Snowden lying or the former Al Qaeda operative who was interviewed?