The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Conservatism and climate science > Comments

Conservatism and climate science : Comments

By Don Aitkin, published 24/6/2014

Given that they have had virtually a monopoly of the mass media, the government and the scientific academies, doesn't that point to a fundamental problem with the 'climate change' message?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 7
  7. 8
  8. 9
  9. Page 10
  10. 11
  11. 12
  12. 13
  13. ...
  14. 27
  15. 28
  16. 29
  17. All
one under god, thanks for your cheery message "SEE YA ANT DROP DED." In relation to the Gangotri glacier, it had hardly been receding; but since 2009 it has been receding at a greater rate. You are right that receding will not impact for some time; but people certainly are expressing concern about it at present; local people.

This is some of the blurb that goes with the film On Thin Ice "Seventy-five percent of the world's fresh water is stored in glaciers, but scientists predict climate change will cause some of the world's largest glaciers to completely melt by 2030. What effect will this have on our daily lives, especially our water and food supply? With global warming falling low on a national list of American concerns, it's time to take a deeper look at what could be a global calamity in the making.

This week, David Brancaccio and environmentalist Conrad Anker—one of the world's leading high altitude climbers—trek to the Gangotri Glacier in the Himalayan Mountains, the source of the Ganges River, to witness the great melt and its dire consequences first-hand. The two also visit Montana's Glacier National Park to see the striking effects of global warming closer to home and learn how melting glaciers across the world can have a direct impact on food prices in the U.S."

http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/516/index.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+NOWonPBS+(NOW+on+PBS
Posted by ant, Saturday, 28 June 2014 9:00:42 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
OUG
Do us all a favour and stop using capitals all the time. It is thought as the same as shouting on the internet, also it is very hard to read.

By the way if cold sinks why do is it that we find snow on the top of the mountains and not at the bottom ?
Posted by warmair, Saturday, 28 June 2014 9:03:25 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
dear warminist ant/its futile/telling us..2030
when i just did the math/proving [yoUR WORST CASE/EGSAMPLED]..WONT FINNISH..ITS MELTING TILL 4023..thats 2000 plus yeads away/ant brains

thus al your other questions only reveal imbisility or insanity or paid tO BE LOYAL[TOOK THE BRIBE]..swallowed the lies/now cant admit you were fooled TOO

LOOK BACK/JUST A DECADE/we were all posting the rubbish your spounting
but one by one/we looked at the lies the data/the name CALLing/the lack of proof/just CLEVER maTH construct and perversion.

but its clEAR you lot too ignorant to do the simple math
cant refute the bleeding obvious..2000 years..isnt a thing you nor i/nor any of us can fix[plus its not even broken]..why ya persist on wasting out time

you cant refute what i say
so you refute how im saying it..im sat=ying grow up

and as for the smow/on top of mountains/think
have you ever sat near a fire too close/and got sunburn
well if your next to a huge iceblock..you gona get snow/the closer to/the outerspace deep freeze ya go

top of the mountain..is closer
to the ice-cold face of INFINITE OUTERSPACE
SO YEP ITS GOING TO GET SNOW/THE REASON THE EARTH DONT FREZE IS WE GOT CONVECTION CARRYING THE HEAT UP /COLD DOWN..IN HUGE COLLEM'S/TORNADO CUMMIN.YOU LOT ARE JUST LIKE THE DOG TOTO/CAUFGHT UP IN YA OWN HOT AIR COLUM..have a nice life

the fact your not presenting fact is cause you got no fact/that justifies the trippling of the cost of energy/the deaths will be on your concious/when the poor freeze to death/cause they cant afford to turn on a heater/or a fan

you fools in your ignorance need wake up urgently
yet again/here..get educated..you got somerhing to sat/say where on which link you refute/it shouldnt be too hard/according to you
http://cecaust.com.au/main.asp?sub=global_warming&id=main.html
Posted by one under god, Saturday, 28 June 2014 12:42:54 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
but how clever..10,000 to bet
on getTing ten billions annual return..LITTLE KNOWING A fraud studdy/costs 10 times that..if you got numbers/make sure they measure the affectonly/..not the cause[ie methane is 100 times as bad as c02/IN HEAT AFFECT;reportedly..plus industry with its cfc's/and THOUSANDS OF OTHER REAL POLLUTANTS/AND YOUR FO-CUSSED ON/WHAT?

lies/lies/spin/guilt/lies/do as i say/not as i do
AGAIN/SCREW THE LOT OF YA...take ya guilt and shove it where the sun dont shine[ya selling a fable/LIVING A DELUSION

2030..IS ONLY 15 YEARS AWAY
REST EASY TILL THEN/IF ITS ALL GOING TO BE MELTED/IT SHOULD allready be half gone[yet not 1/100th/AT BEST CAN BE 'PROVED'/BUT EVEN THAT SHOWS ITS SLOWING.[HALVED SINCE WW2/AT THIS RATE ACCRETION SHALL RESUME/BY 2030\..OH THATS WHY THE PUTCHE IS ON.

Again/be gone
no facts here..runalong.

NUHINGNESS..BAG
Posted by one under god, Saturday, 28 June 2014 12:43:20 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Dear Shadow Minister,

The annual average maximum temperature reading for Sydney has only slipped below the average figure of 21.7 degrees Celsius once in the last 40 years. To me my friend that is a changing climate.

What is it to you? A fluke?
Posted by SteeleRedux, Saturday, 28 June 2014 7:22:43 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Steele, have you forgotten already that you were unable to reference any science to show any measurable effect of human emissions on climate?

You have taken up blatant fraud backing again. You are baselessly asserting that global warming is caused by human emissions. You should be ashamed of yourself for supporting this disgraceful fraud.
Posted by Leo Lane, Saturday, 28 June 2014 11:20:25 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 7
  7. 8
  8. 9
  9. Page 10
  10. 11
  11. 12
  12. 13
  13. ...
  14. 27
  15. 28
  16. 29
  17. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy