The Forum > Article Comments > Why tolerate religion? > Comments
Why tolerate religion? : Comments
By Ralph Seccombe, published 19/6/2014Given the universal human rights of freedom of speech, freedom of assembly etc etc, should there be a separate and additional category of religious rights?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 42
- 43
- 44
- Page 45
- 46
- 47
-
- All
Dear one under god,
.
As I indicated previously, I think the conflict between Israel and the Hamas is partly due to the negative side (yin) of religion (or faith) but more broadly speaking, due to the negative side (yin) of belief.
Holy war is a negative consequence (unfortunately, not the only one) of religion or faith. Ignorance, bigotry, racism, tribalism, nationalism, xenophobia and hate are negative consequences of belief.
The ongoing conflict between Israel and the Hamas is only partly attributable to the worst form of religious intolerance, i.e., bigotry. As you indicated yourself, there’s more to it than that.
At the same time, one under god, you seem to have difficulty accepting the idea that there is a positive and negative side to everything, including religion (or faith).
But you who often posts here, on this forum, on demons, don’t you recognise that there is even a negative side to god - the devil, for example ? Don’t you recognise that even a god never comes alone. That even a god is a two sided coin with a yin and a yang ?
If not, there would be only goodness in the world ? But we all know that that is not so. There is at least as much wickedness as goodness. Isn’t there ?
And so it’s the same for religion. It’s just as good as it’s bad. The positive and negative weigh each other out in the natural law of unstable equilibrium, i.e., “a state of equilibrium in which a small disturbance will produce a large change” (Oxford English Dictionary).
.