What do feminists really think Pt 167.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhvM3BKuWvg
Batsh!t crazy would be the most charitable description of the speaker.

Not all feminists are like that? Prove it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQWoNhrY_fM

Canadian professor of law and Feminist Elizabeth Sheehy writes that abused women should stay with their abuser and kill him rather than leave the home and that the courts should err on the side of self defence in all such cases:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5OJCzJHeyfQ&list=UU255AfKquZnQMO0amxdEGWw

Killarney, Feminism is most definitely not a philosophical school of thought, it's the exact opposite.

I think most females become feminists once their looks & mentality don't attract men anymore. Most women are just that, women & a big thanks to them.

Indi,
I think it's more that women and men in general don't know anything about the true, nihilistic nature of Feminism.
When I talk about Feminists it's with a capital F, all the anti Feminist bloggers and Youtubers I subscribe to are very clear on that distinction, we're not having a go at women in general, just the demagogues and their supporters.
I had a very Liberal upbringing, my mother and her friends were "Women's Libbers", they were a part of the first women's studies group in our district and so forth, what they are not however is capital F Feminists like the ones I've listed previously.
Women's Lib at the grass roots level (at least among the women I grew up around) encouraged women to take responsibility for their own lives, to re-learn skills their pioneer ancestors took for granted, to work with their hands as well as their minds and to seek the truth, or at least live a true existence.
Capital F Feminism (second wave, whatever, they of the SCUM manifesto) is the exact opposite of those ideals:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVuK44kWgxk

What I find really, really strange is, that these Fanatic Feminists so hate & put men down with such vengeful vexious & vociferiousnous that they strive to act, dress & be like men.

I find that very strange, indeed.

A feminist is as a feminist does. I know that feminists want to be given a leg up to become public service managers and on the boards of private companies. They like Audis, expensive clothes and 'networking' dinners sponsored by employers.

They apparently prefer highly paid functions, not work, where the systems are already developed by others and they can contribute their 'people management', 'communication' and 'networking'. Sinecures.
Not sleeves rolled up doing or making, those are duties for the common herd, men and women they look down on.

I have yet to meet a feminist interested in the heaps of available trades work. Highly paid roofing, drains, tiles, bricks, electrical and so on. Please put your hand to start 7.00am sharp any day.

Icy silence from the western feminists.

No surprises there, one cannot expect the comfortable educated middle class elite who own feminism and drive policy to suit their materialism and conspicuous consumption to be out there getting their hands dirty. That is for their class and intellectual lessers and dupes who believe their spin.

One day soon as death looms we all come to realise that the really important things in life come from those mundane family and friends contacts, events and caring, and being of service to their community, all 'onerous traditional duties' ('traditional' is a slur) so despised by that 'Progressive' educated middle class feminist elite.

Jay of Melbourne,
The term Womens Liberation is a misnomer in the first place because feminists are not women, they're mere females misguided by perverse instinct.