Well it's funny that Jewish oriented sites like Galus Australis allow open and frank discussion in an almost anything goes manner under the protection of pseudonyms.
http://galusaustralis.com/2013/10/7964/7964/
No pseudonyms means no comments, no comments means fewer readers, fewer readers means less advertising revenue.
As for incitement could we have some proof please? To do the subject justice we also really need to go into the issue of fake hate crimes and trolling of websites and forums by Jewish groups and individual "Anti Racist" sympathisers and law enforcement officials? Gordon Duff did an investigation of the traffic on his site and found that the majority of the Anti Semitic material posted therein originated in Israel and from Jewish activists.
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/06/11/false-flag-racism-the-internet-proxy-war/
There have been numerous instances of human rights advocates and Police, particularly from Canada deliberately inciting "hate speech"online and even entrapping people, it's not a simple, easily understood situation.
The only way to prevent Jews from being upset or embarrassed by online comments is for their spokespeople to tell their community what everyone else is told, if you don't want to be offended don't use the internet, in other words "Harden the F--- up!"

David G

Before making statements such as the following, I suggest that you check your facts.

“Palestinians have never had a day of true freedom since 1948, that Palestinian children grow up with the sound of Israeli tanks and F16s and the harsh sound of IDF military boots echoing up and down their streets.”

In May 1948 when Israel declared Her Statehood, the Arabs should have done likewise.

But they didn’t.

Instead the armies of 5 Arab States - Egypt, Lebanon, Transjordan, Iraq and Syria. attacked the fledgling country.

Israel won and these bordering nations agreed to formal armistice lines. Israel gained some territory formerly granted to Palestinian Arabs under the UN Resolution in 1947. Egypt and Jordan retained control over the Gaza Strip and the West Bank respectively. These armistice lines held until 1967.

As a result of the war, the State of Israel kept nearly all the area that had been recommended by the UN General Assembly Resolution 181 and took control of almost 60% of the area allocated to the proposed Arab state, including the Jaffa, Lydda and Ramle area, Galilee, some parts of the Negev, a wide strip along the Tel Aviv-Jerusalem road, West Jerusalem, and some territories in the West Bank. Transjordan gained control of the remainder of the West Bank and East Jerusalem, the Egyptian military took control of the Gaza Strip.

No Arab Palestinian state was created. Armistice agreements were signed between all belligerents except Iraqis and Palestinians.

So Egypt had control of Gaza and Jordan, Judaea and Samaria, changing its ancient name to the West Bank, to differentiate it from Trans-Jordan, later to become Jordan.

A Peace Treaty between Egypt and Israel Peace was signed in Washington, D.C. on 26 March 1979, following the 1978 Camp David Accords. The Egypt–Israel treaty was signed by Egyptian President Anwar El Sadat and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin.

Egypt gained control of the Sinai Peninsular and agreed to leave the area demilitarised.

A point to note was that they REFUSED to take Gaza.

PART 2

October 1994 a peace treaty was signed between Israel and Jordan.

Jordan refused the West Bank. The area was sorely neglected and Israel to this day is working on the infrastructure.

Israel is not in ‘occupation’. The West Bank was ‘no man’s land’.

Oslo Accords
Area C of the West Bank some 48,000 Arabs live and not under "military occupation. Under Israeli control according to the Oslo Accords. Arabs are free to go about their daily lives. I have been there.

Area B is largely empty and under joint control with little Israeli presence.

Area A is under PA control, with no Israeli presence with 1.8 million Arabs there.

The Palestinian Arabs have NEVER agreed or accepted anything.
Not 1948, not

1967, in Khartoum they said “No peace with Israel, no negotiations with Israel, no recognition of Israel.’’

2000, Camp David Arafat refused peace, instead launched the deadly terror war, the Second Intifada.

2008 Olmert offered Abbas a peace agreement. A Palestinian state in virtually all the West Bank, Gaza, and part of Jerusalem. Once again it was turned down.
There is not enough space here checkout the Oslo Accords

In 2005 Israel withdrew unilaterally from Gaza, where Jews and Arabs had peacefully lived together, until the advent of Hamas, when peace ended.

They thought it had! Since that time, apart from suicide bombers, kidnapping and more some 12,800 rockets and mortars, an average of 3 attacks every single day, have landed in Israel. That is not including this year, with two last week.

Should the Palestinians ever reject their culture of violence and delegitimising of Jewish rights to any part of the country, peace will be possible and the land divided, however painful that would be for both sides. Such a negotiation would be difficult but, assuming that the Palestinians were ever actually willing to recognise the legitimacy of a Jewish state no matter where its borders were drawn, it would not be impossible.

SF, like Singer you made no admission that the Israelis have ever done anything wrong. You apportion all blame to the Palestinians. Such a view is infantile and defies the facts.

Like Singer, you are dangerous, bigoted and completely one-eyed.

The usual clumsy attempts to equate criticism of Zionism with anti-Semitism--tedious.

SF,

"In May 1948 when Israel declared Her Statehood, the Arabs should have done likewise."

What do you mean by "likewise", that the Arabs should have accepted the legitimacy of the Zionist invasion? Don't bother to mention the squalid agreements by fading imperialist nations, corrupt Arab "representatives" and Zionist colonialists,the Palestinians were simply the "natives".

@SF
I reckon the Palestinians would be more than willing to recognise the legitimacy of a Jewish state provided that its borders were not drawn through their, the Palestinians', living rooms.
And further to all this carry-on about how everyone is unfairly picking on the oh-so-righteous Israelis, can you imagine the outcry if it were Israeli olive trees being chopped down and Israeli homes being bulldozed?
You're talking nonsense, and I expect you know it.