Given the crap conditions and pay for taxi drivers, and that taxi driving has traditionally been one of the few jobs readily available to unskilled (or even skilled) migrants, little wonder that the only white male taxi drivers you are likely to come across are those who can afford to buy a licence. The people who own the taxi companies are, I believe, exclusively white males.

Suseonline, it will probably come as a surprise for someone to tell you this but white men are not all in the one class. It suits men at the top for harried women to be in the workforce in the largest numbers possible. As with big numbers of immigrants it helps to force up the price of everything and keep wages down, ergo company profits go up and they can take home astronomical pay packets to their pampered wives. The Salvo's research tell us if these wives have a "domestic" with their husbands, they won't go off to a women's refuge because they don't have tennis courts and swimming pools.

When its time for upper class men to get their next trophy wife no fault divorce is the way to go. Child support only represents a minuscule amount of their pay packet and they can still afford the ski trip with their kids to Whistler plus half a dozen other trips in the year. If the ex tries to get cute in a child custody dispute by perjuring herself as our fundamentally flawed family law in this country allows he has the income to hire top silk.

So when you sneeringly say: "One only needs to look around the world to see how badly off all those white men are! Are you for real?" I am sure you are thinking of white men more in the upper class than the average white man.

The femisists got what they wanted and are not happy.One would think we would want a progression of all human consciousness,which should include both sexes.

There is no priviliege whatsoever in being a White man and like Brown men if we want a better life the only way we can get it is either by working for it in some demeaning or dangerous job or taking it by force and deception like the "upper class". See that's the point, the "Rich White Males" have stepped over all other White males via deception and the use of force to get where they are ,so by generalising and roping all White men into a class Candide and her ilk are simply betraying the fact that they are anti White. They will spit their bile at White Men while their wimpy pet husbands will deride and degrade White women every chance they get, this Anit Racism and Anti Sexism talk is just a ruse, what they really oppose is the very existence of people of my ethnic group.
Yet the question remains for White men, if not us then who?
Put African or Asian men in charge and you'll get stupendous personal corruption, nepotism, child sex slavery, institutionalised torture and rape and gangs of "youth" shaking down everyone who does try to get ahead.
The only places in which women and children have "rights" are the societies with White men in charge and White soldiers prepared to kill anyone who challenges the system.

Bile Jay? All I did was point out the status quo, which is that white males (some, not all, point taken) are currently at the top of the pile. I would prefer the upper echelons to be occupied on merit, which in my ideal world would preclude the corrupt and venal of any gender or race. And I would like to see institutional bias overcome, as in the unwarranted preponderance of men on Australian company boards and the unhelpful preponderance of women in primary teaching.

Candide,
Explanation accepted and apology offered.
The problem with "empowering" women is that you get a class of mainly White women at or near the top of a society with exactly the same vile temperament as the males they are supposed to supplant, are you honestly proud of women like Hillary Clinton, Julia Gillard, and Susan Rice? Further to that I'd ask why, if a simple man such as myself can learn to manipulate women by studying their psychology don't you think the cunning old White Men at the top of the Anglosphere aren't going to do the same thing?
There's a couple of great videos on Youtube which explore these themes, albeit in a different way, one features the late Tony Judt and another Tony Pinn and they go into the pitfalls of being wedged into the role of front man for a particular group or tendency purely because of their race and the perception that they'll allow others to "get away with more" due to the presence of them as minorities in mainly White movements such as BDS or Atheistkult. My point is that "empowered" women and men from minority groups have thus far merely ended up as front men/women for the elites and that's a process arising of the overall temperament of those "Cunning Old Men", pretty neat trick, hiding their activities behind women's skirts and the White guilt of the wider public.
Julia Gillard and Barack Obama are not in office due to meritorious service or outstanding leadership ability, neither possess any such quality, they are there because of their gender and their race.