>>My point was not that there were no homosexuals before communism.<<

Liar. I quote directly from the post you made yesterday:

>>Homosexuals are just another 'class' created by the left<<

You explicitly stated that the left created homosexuals - the logical corollary of that statement is that before the left created them there were no homosexuals. And now that somebody has called BS on your ridiculous claims you want to pretend that you never made those claims in the first place. Very amusing.

Cheers,

Tony

@Tony Lavis, Sorry, donkey, but you're wrong. Here's that same quote again, IN CONTEXT (typical lefty)...

"Homosexuals are just another 'class' created by the left as a tool to eradicate the human species, just as Jews were classified and used to destroy the nation of Europe."

So, what did I state? I explicitly stated that the left created a CLASS of homosexuals, just as they created a CLASS of jews. Homos and jews existed, but the left CLASSIFIED them to further the cause of the left.

You can't read and the only way that you can be heard is to misquote other people and take their statements out of context. THAT'S amusing!

The Truth, there is no such thing as Reds under the bed! It was just your mum and dad scaring you into voting Family First !!

Reading the sort of rubbish posted here shows how wicked the heart of those on the left and right are. Thank God for the way, the TRUTH, and the life. His profound truth, love and wisdom exposes how vain the pride of man is.

@ Tony Lavis.
The point I'm trying to get across is that European people (or Indo European if you like) have no problem with homosexuality per se but that it has a European context, or let's say it has an Indo European form. Hadrian's life would be an example of that form, also the idealistic, homoerotic ideal of the Pagan warrior bands, the Wolf cults, Achilles and his Myrmidons marching off to India at one glance youthful warriors, at another a band of girls.
Semites, that is Jews, Christians and Muslims have an ideological prohibition against homosexuality but still practice the European model of erotic male elitism and homophilia behind closed doors, Afghanistan's "Boy Parties", Iran's men only "camping trips" etc. Even the storied Mujahideen, probably the most overtly masculine and elitist fighting force of our age are known for their "Effeminate" ways when out in the field, according to western observers they embrace and kiss each other, hold hands and curl up together (spooning) to sleep.

What I want to know is whether a society in which Men marry could still produce it's Hadrians and Alexanders or even it's Stephen Frys and Noel Cowards?
My current position is that the push for Gay Marriage is an attempt by our managerial castes to neutralise the resurgence of European male elitism, as we can see it certainly belittles authentic male bonding and erotic love between men by equating the honourable with the perverse and infamous.

@ The Truth.
Get a grip, according to you I'm a racist Nazi and a Jew lover ? You'd fit right in over at VNN.

Kipp writes

'The Truth, there is no such thing as Reds under the bed! It was just your mum and dad scaring you into voting Family First !!'

No they don't hide anymore. They blatantly push their perverted way of life openly without an ounce of embarassment. Just look at the 'gay pride ' parades. The word shame is reserved for anyone speaking the truth.