Runner, Andrew Bolt is your source of information, mate that means you are are just puppet talking.

Kipp

well compared with you Bolt is a genius. Sorry to disappoint however but I can assure you Bolt is not a believer in the Lord Jesus Christ. Good try but you are wrong.

woot has gone moot
[he forgot my bite[toot toot]

love the way the skinny one run away
with the so typical non response[lol]

""one under god

sorry I don't engage with people who:
1. can't construct a sentence. In English;""

mate...you must have tried
but saw the size of the cat you cou8ldnt skin
and ranaway..from the topic all together..[just like moot woot]

""2.can't spell;""

yep ya got me there[i use many wurds
from many formats..clearly your limited in your comprehention]
or afraid of the fact you cant refute...lol

""3.can't format..their mental disorganisation
into something coherent on a page.""

mate...the stuff in ""
is my quoting others questions

im presuming you didnt read pericules questions
before he too wernt silent[dont sweat on it child]
i once was like you..till i realised..the science mud man
has feet of clay]

""Last time...I invoked the Mental Health Act...""

this seems a constant ATHIEST SOLUTION
last time it was re-education camps
for us deluded religionst's..lol

""I'm not holding my breath..for anything iluminating.""

lol your so funny and clever mr sticky

how about you reply my three questions

name the 'first life'..
the*..first living thing's..*GENUS?

two
name the first 'evolution'..of this named genus..
INTO ITS 'evolved'[lol]..NEW 2de/GENUS*..[name it]

3 present the micro-species/evolution..*dna
that..lol..'evolved'..lol...

THREE SIMPLE QUESTIONS!
mr winky

present your science
but you CANT..lol..you ONLY GOT FAITH...in ..science

you..got no idea of the lies
in the THEORY*..the lie of a tree of life

know fact from theor-ry
present fact..[there aint nun]
get it slinky..not one proof..[ITS A THEORY*]

science dont know nuthin
never evolved..any new genus ever!

ya athiesm..rests on feet of clay*

OUG,

Last time we discussed this I helped you express your evolutionary theory as a testable hypothesis. I also provided you with the tools, freely available online (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) to test your hypothesis.

I see that you continue to assert that evolution is limited by some unknown mechanism. Have you generated any data to back up these claims? If so I would be happy to review and help you prepare for publication. After all, such a major discovery would easily be accepted into the journals Nature, or Science. All you need to do is present your data.

hi stezza..great to see you guys come alive[even if only annually]

anyhow..how many new genus this year
have you evolved?

i note trillions of 'breedings globally
has only made young like their own kind

so your lot isnt doing a real lot
why?..cause its a theory

one that would long ago have been refuted..
if it wasnt taught AS FACT..[to innocent children]

you need link to web sites...as if its some proof

mate..name the first life!

name its first genus!

...name what it evoloved into..what next genus?

thing is..you got no proof!
[your THEOry claims science;..PRESENT IT]

you got theory/links

but not one evolution..*of genus...*EVER
two heads dissappear..one
yet no proof

lol

been cruising your link...
seems ya still trying..to rig the game

How do I find data..that used to be in the old Genome database?

The new Genome IDs..lcannot be directly mapped.;.LOL
to the old Genome IDs..because the data types are very different..lol

Each old Genome/ID..lol
represented a single sequence..that can still be found
in Entrez Nucleotide..using standard Entrez searches..or the E-utilities.

We recommend that you convert..old Genome IDs
to Nucleotide GI numbers..using the following remapping file available..on the NCBI/FTPsite:
ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/genomes/old_genomeID2nucGI

The old tabular format has been changed.!*!
The new tables are available here:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/browse/

Text versions of the tables..can be downloaded..from the NCBI FTP site:
ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/genomes/GENOME_REPORTS/

Previously developed tables(lproks.cgi,leuks,cgi)
will be supported for the next 2 months,..[lol]

and are available..on the NCBI/FTP site:
ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/genomes/genomeprj/

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/About/news/17Nov2011.html

The new Genome database..shares a close relationship
with the recently...>>redesigned BioProject database
>>>(formerly Genome Project).

Primary information..about genome sequencing projects
in the new Genome database..is stored in the BioProject/database.

BioProject records of type.."Organism Overview"
have become Genome records..with a Genome ID
that maps uniquely..lol..to a BioProject ID.

The new Genome database..also includes
all "genome sequencing"..records in BioProject.



What are the differences..between the old..and new Genome database?

Single genome records..now represent an organism
and not a genome..for one isolate.

A record..can contain multiple genomes..of different strains/isolates lol

or multiple assemblies
of the same isolate/individual.lol

Examples:

Escherichia coli..is only one record
in new Genome database..as opposed to hundreds of chromosomes..and plasmids for different strains.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/167

Mus musculus..is only one record
in new Genome database..*but it points to six different Assemblies.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/52

Organelles and plasmids..that are not part of the whole genome (chromosomes)..are no longer indexed*!*!

and therefore cannot be found..lol
by using Genome Search terms...!!

lol

They can be found..only by an organism search."""

NAME NAMES
give actual proof!

''The scope of Genome..has expanded
from only RefSeq genomes..to all genomes..(both INSDC and RefSeq).

The E-utilities(Entrez API)..interface
to Genome..(db=genome)...[lol]..has changed to reflect
the new data model...

Please see the E-utility documentation..for details:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK25500/
For example,the Genome DocSum ..Document Summary)has new fields:
http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/esummary.fcgi?db=genome&id=176

mate name genus*names
before the conmerchants..name change..yet again