The Forum > Article Comments > Atheism for kids and teens > Comments
Atheism for kids and teens : Comments
By Graham Preston, published 11/4/2012Paradoxically, life is simultaneously both, not for anything, and, for anything.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Page 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
-
- All
Runner, Andrew Bolt is your source of information, mate that means you are are just puppet talking.
Posted by Kipp, Thursday, 12 April 2012 6:56:08 PM
| |
Kipp
well compared with you Bolt is a genius. Sorry to disappoint however but I can assure you Bolt is not a believer in the Lord Jesus Christ. Good try but you are wrong. Posted by runner, Thursday, 12 April 2012 7:00:33 PM
| |
woot has gone moot
[he forgot my bite[toot toot] love the way the skinny one run away with the so typical non response[lol] ""one under god sorry I don't engage with people who: 1. can't construct a sentence. In English;"" mate...you must have tried but saw the size of the cat you cou8ldnt skin and ranaway..from the topic all together..[just like moot woot] ""2.can't spell;"" yep ya got me there[i use many wurds from many formats..clearly your limited in your comprehention] or afraid of the fact you cant refute...lol ""3.can't format..their mental disorganisation into something coherent on a page."" mate...the stuff in "" is my quoting others questions im presuming you didnt read pericules questions before he too wernt silent[dont sweat on it child] i once was like you..till i realised..the science mud man has feet of clay] ""Last time...I invoked the Mental Health Act..."" this seems a constant ATHIEST SOLUTION last time it was re-education camps for us deluded religionst's..lol ""I'm not holding my breath..for anything iluminating."" lol your so funny and clever mr sticky how about you reply my three questions name the 'first life'.. the*..first living thing's..*GENUS? two name the first 'evolution'..of this named genus.. INTO ITS 'evolved'[lol]..NEW 2de/GENUS*..[name it] 3 present the micro-species/evolution..*dna that..lol..'evolved'..lol... THREE SIMPLE QUESTIONS! mr winky present your science but you CANT..lol..you ONLY GOT FAITH...in ..science you..got no idea of the lies in the THEORY*..the lie of a tree of life know fact from theor-ry present fact..[there aint nun] get it slinky..not one proof..[ITS A THEORY*] science dont know nuthin never evolved..any new genus ever! ya athiesm..rests on feet of clay* Posted by one under god, Friday, 13 April 2012 8:15:52 AM
| |
OUG,
Last time we discussed this I helped you express your evolutionary theory as a testable hypothesis. I also provided you with the tools, freely available online (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) to test your hypothesis. I see that you continue to assert that evolution is limited by some unknown mechanism. Have you generated any data to back up these claims? If so I would be happy to review and help you prepare for publication. After all, such a major discovery would easily be accepted into the journals Nature, or Science. All you need to do is present your data. Posted by Stezza, Monday, 16 April 2012 6:55:02 AM
| |
hi stezza..great to see you guys come alive[even if only annually]
anyhow..how many new genus this year have you evolved? i note trillions of 'breedings globally has only made young like their own kind so your lot isnt doing a real lot why?..cause its a theory one that would long ago have been refuted.. if it wasnt taught AS FACT..[to innocent children] you need link to web sites...as if its some proof mate..name the first life! name its first genus! ...name what it evoloved into..what next genus? thing is..you got no proof! [your THEOry claims science;..PRESENT IT] you got theory/links but not one evolution..*of genus...*EVER two heads dissappear..one yet no proof lol Posted by one under god, Monday, 16 April 2012 10:28:43 AM
| |
been cruising your link...
seems ya still trying..to rig the game How do I find data..that used to be in the old Genome database? The new Genome IDs..lcannot be directly mapped.;.LOL to the old Genome IDs..because the data types are very different..lol Each old Genome/ID..lol represented a single sequence..that can still be found in Entrez Nucleotide..using standard Entrez searches..or the E-utilities. We recommend that you convert..old Genome IDs to Nucleotide GI numbers..using the following remapping file available..on the NCBI/FTPsite: ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/genomes/old_genomeID2nucGI The old tabular format has been changed.!*! The new tables are available here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/browse/ Text versions of the tables..can be downloaded..from the NCBI FTP site: ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/genomes/GENOME_REPORTS/ Previously developed tables(lproks.cgi,leuks,cgi) will be supported for the next 2 months,..[lol] and are available..on the NCBI/FTP site: ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/genomes/genomeprj/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/About/news/17Nov2011.html The new Genome database..shares a close relationship with the recently...>>redesigned BioProject database >>>(formerly Genome Project). Primary information..about genome sequencing projects in the new Genome database..is stored in the BioProject/database. BioProject records of type.."Organism Overview" have become Genome records..with a Genome ID that maps uniquely..lol..to a BioProject ID. The new Genome database..also includes all "genome sequencing"..records in BioProject. What are the differences..between the old..and new Genome database? Single genome records..now represent an organism and not a genome..for one isolate. A record..can contain multiple genomes..of different strains/isolates lol or multiple assemblies of the same isolate/individual.lol Examples: Escherichia coli..is only one record in new Genome database..as opposed to hundreds of chromosomes..and plasmids for different strains. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/167 Mus musculus..is only one record in new Genome database..*but it points to six different Assemblies. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/52 Organelles and plasmids..that are not part of the whole genome (chromosomes)..are no longer indexed*!*! and therefore cannot be found..lol by using Genome Search terms...!! lol They can be found..only by an organism search.""" NAME NAMES give actual proof! ''The scope of Genome..has expanded from only RefSeq genomes..to all genomes..(both INSDC and RefSeq). The E-utilities(Entrez API)..interface to Genome..(db=genome)...[lol]..has changed to reflect the new data model... Please see the E-utility documentation..for details: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK25500/ For example,the Genome DocSum ..Document Summary)has new fields: http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/esummary.fcgi?db=genome&id=176 mate name genus*names before the conmerchants..name change..yet again Posted by one under god, Monday, 16 April 2012 11:08:58 AM
|