The Forum > Article Comments > Atheism for kids and teens > Comments
Atheism for kids and teens : Comments
By Graham Preston, published 11/4/2012Paradoxically, life is simultaneously both, not for anything, and, for anything.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Page 15
-
- All
this board is a resplendent example of the old adage that empty vessels make the most sound.
Posted by grantnw, Sunday, 22 April 2012 9:17:53 AM
| |
Posted
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=13537&page=0 by..EricG,/quote..""Do you know the scientific method? Blind faith is the antithesis of science."" yes an interesting point how do you explain..the claim..'evolution'[macro..] ;as in mutating..*out of one genus and creating..[evolving]..into other genus DO YOU HAVE ONE..fully faulsafyable witness [let alone any 'science proof.! of a change of genus.. [as postulated..by many by faith in..the THEORy of evolution} i have asked many but you make this high claim ""The whole idea..is NOT to require faith but to look for the answer."" so have you the proof of even one genus evolving into any other genus like that postulated..by the now busted..THEORY [the tree of life project]..and the destruction of taxonomy..as being 'science' see..as you know many genus..are loosing their claimed genus relations [via dna not validating gene linkage[let alone evolution..exta genus seems many divergent mutations create..a phenotype[looks like] but..*we now KNOW..their dna..isnt validating the genetic's evolving[as the theory..*would need..to be science] most hold theory but you claim fact please lets get serious.. if you dont got the science the theory is void..[based on fossil;ie.lookslike.. not genomic linkage proof for genus evolution..by actual[not theoretical..[genotype] the tree of like..is more a forrest please..name the first ';life..[by genus] and what it evolved into[by genus][..with dna..to link fact with fact not faith with theory ""From my career in genetics and molecular biology..and lecturing on the scientific method,..the worst scientists that I worked with were those...*who had too much faith!! ""in their own abilities and ideas and consequently did not check if their methods worked correctly every time or test other ideas..to see if they were better explanations."" i dont want a better story I WANT SCIENCE PROOF..the dna linkage[genotype] not looks like..[phentype] [what are the bounds..of genus] where is evolution..out/of[from]..parental genus.. in mendelic ratio's.. http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=13479&page=0 Posted by one under god, Thursday, 26 April 2012 10:37:09 AM
|