""Then using a simple program such as http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi
you could measure both the variation..in the genetic sequence for various genes..and well as predict efficacy..in DNA repair mechanisms.""

this proves what
you can cut/paste?
\
""You can do this yourself from home.""

i breed just under a 1000 fish each year
not only fish..but a specific species/genus

I NEVER GET ANYTHING but fish from them
GEE are you surpiszed!

4..state how any species would 'know' the 'genus mean'""

it all works/..like a dream
or it dies...it dont know[yet ignorance is no excuse[not for you nor thye dead theory..GIVE PROOF..NAME NAMES[none..means ya got nuthin]

""You are arguing..a faith position
and are intentionally keeping yourself ignorant
out of the fear of what you may find out""

your good with wurds
but ignorant re the science..you claim underpins ya faithlessness

how go you!
make*..your heart beat?

yet another question you dont got answer for..
natural response wont cut it
[nor natural reflex..

nor anything with natural in it..

[NATURES NURTURE belongs to god]..
doing the whole living/evolving thing..so naturally

so precise..yet so naturally
that science cant even explain it..
yet alone theorise how they could copy it

the theory is fraud
your words offer no means..
no mechanism..no insite..as to how god...does any of it

at least give what belongs TO GOD..back to god
at least untill acience evolves its first new genus

Ah, you see OUG, that is where you are mistaken. There are many theories regarding evolution, from pre-Darwin to modern evolutionary synthesis. None of these theories have been developed by myself, however I do understand them and their implications. You have proposed: That evolution occurs within a species, but is limited by DNA repair mechanisms that vary in efficacy in relation to distance from the genus mean.

This is yet another evolutionary theory. You proposed this theory, although I helped you express it in a coherent sentence on your behalf. Since this theory is testable then it may be correct. However until you or someone else tests this theory, it remains simply an untested idea. The onus is on you to to provide evidence of YOUR theory. If you can provide evidence I will gladly accept your theory. If you remain too cowardly to test your idea then it is obvious that even you do not think that it is true, so why would anyone else.

Time to put up or shut up

stezza/quote''Time to put up or shut up"""

what follows must 'be' his proof of genus evolution

""Ah, you see OUG,
that is where you are mistaken.

There are many theories regarding evolution,
from pre-Darwin to modern evolutionary synthesis.""

lol your funny..ha ha
darwins finches..are my egsample..lol
of fluctuating between the genus [finch genus]..mean

see in dry times..short thick genes'survive best]
in wet times the longbeaked species..survives best
BOTH ARE FINCHES....again lets call on DARWINS pigions

the bluebar columbia
that varies within its genus mean
from fan tail..to jacobin...to pouter to crested tumbler's
ALL VAIRIATTIONS OF THE COLUMBIA GENUS

i love darewin

""None of these theories
have been developed by myself,""

me neither

YOU SHOW ME YOURS
i will show you..MANY OF THE SAME NAMES
but you havnt lol read them...lol..have you

read the four volumes[plus]..from darwin..[origen of SPECIES]
because EVEN he never heard of ewvolution OUT OF genus

""however I do understand them
and their implications.""

lol

""You have proposed:That""
,ocro-""evolution occurs within a species,
but is limited by DNA repair mechanisms..that vary
in efficacy..in relation to distance from the genus mean.""

no
you see even darwin
noted dominant/resesesive..expresions
within the genotype..[finch or rockdove]..acording to phenotype
[after the finches..were all proved to 'be' finches..!

same breeds same
WHY DIDNT DARWIN WRITE..[evolution of genus?

cause he PROVED genus dont evolve
and any one..BREEDING fruitflies..and getting only genus fruitfly
validates my truth too[you claim evolution=new genus..darwin and i state..its only species specific..pre-egsistant..WITHIN the gernomic quotant..of its family genus

"" Since this theory is testable
then it may be correct.""

sure/
the firstnew genus to evolve refutes mine
TROUBLE BEING..not one ever*

please present one proof of a genus evolving into a new genus

NUN EGSISTS
cause its a lie!

""The onus is on you..to to provide evidence of YOUR theory.""

lol

MY THEORY=no change of genus
you say there is proof of evolution of genus

*PRESENT IT*

"MY THEORY=no change of genus"

We have established that. We have also established that you are not willing to perform a simple experiment to prove your theory. Perhaps you have done the experiment and found that you are wrong.

Hey stezza! Ever bashed your head repeatedly against a brick wall? It feels really, really good when you stop..

Best of luck, Stezza. Whatever you do don't try this (my feeble effort)...

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=12050#210411