http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=12541#216775

vanna, the closet communists HAVE learned from the past, what they, the feMANazis & the GLBT types have been doing for half a century now is deliberate, premeditated, failure training.

They know for a fact that children have, are, will be neglected & abused. The more dysfunctional our society/culture becomes, the sooner capitalism fails, the sooner the Maoists can take over.

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=12541#216779

briar rose, GLBT groups were screaming for more "mental health" funds to be directed away from general public services like "beyond blue" towards the GLBT community because of their infinately higher mental illness & suicide rates.

Why put children into a train that you know in advance is heading towards a "damaged" track & a certain derailment crash?

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=12541#216780

Kenny, because an earlier generation of "social engineers" was scheming to destroy the extended family.

"united we stand, divided we fall"

Failure planning, often leads to deliberate, premeditated failure, funny that.

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=12541#216782

Kipp, i have seen your point, "2 wrongs DO make a right". There is just another MORE than half of the truth you left out, all the children of good christians who had a wonderful childhood.

One of us "EVIL" christians even dared to admit to having a wonderful childhood.

Why do you closet communists hate children so much?

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=12541#216783

vanna, so true.

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=12541#216787

Philo, correct again.

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=12541#216789

Flo, more of the "2 wrongs make a wrong" argument.

In those earlier times parental death was roughly 50/50, widows were encouraged to socialise with each other, marry each other, the original "blended family" & what did it produce? Fairy tales like cinderella, the original parable about DV, which shows the truth, about women being more likely to do it than men.

Whats that I here' its god' rumbling down with floods and bolts of lightening?......NO! its just Snag and philo showing their true characteristics of peace and good will.

Now Ned Flanders does his block here, all in the name of good intentions.

It would seem Gays have no rights in the eyes of the LAW...lol.....and didn't big J take a young boy into his bed to teach him the ways of the Lord? Well that's what the bible says:)

http://tinyurl.com/3ezuzr5

Are normal people that annoying?

or is it just the Devil coming out?

Now Now little GOD dudes, don't have a cow:)

Cactus

>> ""Marriage is the act of the male sperm uniting with the female ovum.""

Posted by Philo, Thursday, 1 September 2011 10:10:31 AM

That's conception, Philo.

Flo,
There is considerable evidence of data already being hidden about homosexuality, for political purposes.

For example, data about domestic violence in homosexual relationships is not usually mentioned, while people such as feminists scream out data about domestic violence in heterosexual relationships at every opportunity, and of course the male is always the perpetrator.

Interesting that several studies have found domestic violence in lesbian relationships is about 50%, something I have never heard mentioned by feminists or homosexuals.

The following article is interesting: -

Domestic Violence in Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Relationships

http://www.lambda.org/DV_background.htm

Robert,

In regards to homophobia, I would think there is a much more likely case for heterophobia.

There are almost no positive remarks said by homosexuals about heterosexuals.

Negative, discriminatory and bigoted remarks about heterosexuals, and in particular heterosexual males, are universal in feminism.

Negative, discriminatory and bigoted remarks about heterosexuals, and in particular heterosexual males, are also very common amongst academics.

So I would think there is a much more solid case for wide spread heterophobia in our society.

vanna, "There are almost no positive remarks said by homosexuals about heterosexuals."

I doubt that's any more true than a generalised statement about any other group saying positive things about heterosexuals.

If it was try it would be worth asking yourself if you like being judged because you rarely (if ever) make positive remarks about women?
If it was true perhaps a lot less attacks on homosexuals might reduce some of the causes.

It's yet another attempt to try and justify discrimination that can't be justified.

No heterosexual looses if homosexuals are allowed to marry, in fact the more freedom from vilification and discrimination that homosexuals face the better off heterosexuals are. It lessens the chances of finding that our spouse is someone who's been trying to be heterosexual and not having it work. It lessens the chance that someone close to us may have to go through the trauma of abuse and vilification that some teenagers still face.

Other than reducing opportunity for some to take out their own issues on others lives equal rights for homosexuals takes nothing from us. If some ones god really has an issue with it let their god deal with it directly, in the meantime everyone else should leave others lives alone.

R0bert

vanna....are you giving online counseling services now:) The fact is, sexual preference has nothing to do with domestic violence. Quite a moot point, don't you think? Humans by nature' regardless of religion, colour or creed will act out in what ever environment, given the right circumstances and you know what Iam talking about.

Religion its self has quite a bit to answer for, so don't get me started:) small world isn't:)

Humans are Humans in what ever context, and to get personal on any level concerning homosexual violence or other wise, can cost those dearly in comparison with the focus not being aimed at any one, but more singling out what is one or the other in disagreeing with the contexts of reasoning.

A very poor attempted assassination of the subject matter, which you have failed to prove anything which sades one way or the other of who/which heterosexuals or homosexuals behaviorals, are of no side-able or winnable point....The man-bear-pig in is all of us, nice try.

In other words, don't waste readers time:) with factors or fact-less, which in this case.

Cactus