The Forum > Article Comments > Parliamentarians should have a conscience vote on gay marriage > Comments
Parliamentarians should have a conscience vote on gay marriage : Comments
By Rodney Croome, published 1/11/2010For often perverse reasons our parliamentary institutions have failed to keep pace with public opinion on gay marriage.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Page 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- ...
- 25
- 26
- 27
-
- All
Posted by Proxy, Tuesday, 9 November 2010 8:01:35 PM
| |
"smart-arse response",
"bigoted outlook". "too gutless" "screwed with your mind" "pathetic outlook" "sociopathic tendencies" Your arguments above are the most cogent yet in support of homosexual "marriage". No Proxy, they are a response to your inadequacy at providing a cogent case in support of your bigotry. These words are quite reasonable, although regretful in having to express them, to a thinking mind. Let’s hope one day you can overcome your disadvantage in this area and you can join with the rest of a thoughtful humanity in accepting the differences in our species without unhelpful input from imaginary supernatural precepts This is not just for those you vilify but also for your own sake regarding the only life you will ever have. Think about it, think deeply and think long. David Posted by Atheist Foundation of Australia Inc, Tuesday, 9 November 2010 9:29:22 PM
| |
ALGOREisRICH.
Firstly, how can one take the words of an entity that has no foundation to the facts at hand regarding important discussions that obviously you cant bring your God to the table so we can here his/her claims on the matters at hand. So........we just have to take your man written book as the word of the over-all mighty one and ruler/maker of the universe. Or did you hear the man say it, that gays should be beaten spat at and loathed by all that have some dislike against loving and consenting adults in the hands of matrimony? What Bob brown said in this link is quite correct. http://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CBsQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.perthnow.com.au%2Fnews%2Fwestern-australia%2Fgreens-senator-bob-brown-says-gillard-wrong-to-oppose-gay-marriage%2Fstory-e6frg13u-1225886249111&rct=j&q=bob%20browns%20veiws%20on%20gay%20marriage&ei=-jbZTIeDLob0cb6ujYQI&usg=AFQjCNHcSTH4vMwR4lHR3ABiTKQPpuj0Iw&cad=rja And this. http://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CCkQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.geelongadvertiser.com.au%2Farticle%2F2010%2F07%2F22%2F193541_news.html&rct=j&q=bob%20browns%20veiws%20on%20gay%20marriage&ei=-jbZTIeDLob0cb6ujYQI&usg=AFQjCNGg18TMsSE6C1N-6lp7aVmdOA4s4Q&cad=rja When the people speak, its heard well. BLUE Posted by Deep-Blue, Tuesday, 9 November 2010 10:20:26 PM
| |
<<This is not just for those you vilify...>>
<<smart-arse...>> <<bigoted...>> <<gutless...>> <<screwed...mind>> <<pathetic...>> <<sociopathic...>> <<These words are quite reasonable>> I get it. I'm vilifying and you're being reasonable. Glad we sorted that out. Posted by Proxy, Tuesday, 9 November 2010 10:29:04 PM
| |
wow... what a smart bunch of humans... :)
Posted by jinny, Wednesday, 10 November 2010 4:58:48 AM
| |
Proxy,
Stop using the hurt fawn defence. The only disadvantage you suffer because of expressive language is that your ‘opinion’ is not popularly supported as it once might have been. Society has grown but you have not. On the other hand, your words added to those of the likeminded, cause actual suffering, sometimes death and at least social disadvantage. You are the aggravator not the aggrieved. David Posted by Atheist Foundation of Australia Inc, Wednesday, 10 November 2010 7:45:39 AM
|
"bigoted outlook".
"too gutless"
"screwed with your mind"
"pathetic outlook"
"sociopathic tendencies"
Your arguments above are the most cogent yet in support of homosexual "marriage".