The Forum > Article Comments > Parliamentarians should have a conscience vote on gay marriage > Comments
Parliamentarians should have a conscience vote on gay marriage : Comments
By Rodney Croome, published 1/11/2010For often perverse reasons our parliamentary institutions have failed to keep pace with public opinion on gay marriage.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Page 25
- 26
- 27
-
- All
Posted by Proxy, Tuesday, 23 November 2010 8:58:59 PM
| |
The author might better concentrate on real issues facing his bedfellows:
UN General Assembly Votes To Allow Gays To Be Executed Without Cause: http://vladtepesblog.com/?p=27711 This may not be the time to be campaigning for "gay" "marriage" in Africa, the Middle East or the Carribean. Posted by Proxy, Wednesday, 24 November 2010 10:15:45 PM
| |
"Jesus can cure anything thats what miracles are."
-Huggins Why doesn't Jesus cure amputees? "Clearly homosexual behaviour is sexually dysfunctional. It is clearly not normal. How can it be normal when it is practised by only 1-2% of the population? What part of the word normal don't you understand?" -Proxy Apparently the bit that makes it synomynous with 'common'. Homosexuality may be rare, but that doesn't make it abnormal - human albinism, haemochromatosis, 130 IQ's and Down's syndrome are all rare - are they abnormal? I'm certain you wouldn't tell the mother of a Down's syndrome child that they had a freak baby. That would be insensitive. So why is it okay to label homosexuality, and apparently only homosexuality, as 'abnormal' - and bully them accordingly - when everybody else gets off scot free? Posted by Riz Too, Thursday, 25 November 2010 12:13:00 AM
| |
Dear dear Proxy...what would we do without your posts ?
THANX... I want to take it a step further about executing gays. Here is the bit: http://vladtepesblog.com/?p=27711 Gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people were once again subject to the whims of homophobia and religious and cultural extremism this week, thanks to a United Nations vote that removed “sexual orientation” from a resolution that protects people from arbitrary executions. In other words, the UN General Assembly this week voted to allow LGBT people to be executed without cause. Notice the words "A United Nations Vote"....oooooh yeah..we need to DECODE this and see what's really there. Hmmmm *thinks* ummmm.....could it BE the OIC?(Organization of Islamic Conference voting block of 56 nations? ? ?) //The UN General Assembly’s Third Committee on Social, Cultural and Humanitarian issues removed “sexual orientation” from a resolution addressing extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions this past week in a vote that was overwhelming represented by a majority of African, Middle East and Carribean nations.// All I can say is that NEXT time you progressives and leftards go out in support for some 'accomodation' for Islamic ways.. remember to put on your industrial strength 'ass' chastity belt because such an idiotic move will come back to BITE-CHA. (as it has done here) Posted by ALGOREisRICH, Thursday, 25 November 2010 9:57:20 AM
| |
So some moslems are as intolerant and irrational as some christians. What is your point?
Posted by Riz Too, Thursday, 25 November 2010 6:51:38 PM
| |
Yes AGiR,
As you would know, I am a long-time multiculturalist and supporter of the United Nations. We need to remember that diverse countries have diverse ways of doing things. Some in the West might think that executing homosexuals is harsh but who are we to judge another culture or say that our way of responding to the relentless homosexualisation of our culture is better than their response. All cultures are different but equal. Perhaps those countries have observed what is happening in the West and determined that the only way to stop the homosexual juggernaut is through tough love. It seems to be working for them. Posted by Proxy, Thursday, 25 November 2010 7:05:08 PM
|
How can you rest your case when you haven't even made one?
Furthermore you appear incapable of rebutting mine.
dysfunctional:
- Not operating normally or properly
Clearly homosexual behaviour is sexually dysfunctional.
It is clearly not normal.
How can it be normal when it is practised by only 1-2% of the population?
What part of the word normal don't you understand?
The penis and vagina "operate properly" together.
They are sexually and biologically and mechanically and reproductively compatible.
As per the natural order.
The penis and anus do not "operate properly" together.
They are sexually and biologically and mechanically and reproductively incompatible.
It is a disordered pairing.
Hence the preponderance of anal trauma, anal cancer, HIV AIDs and manifold other STD's, etc, amongst practicioners of anal sex.
An animals vagina is more physiologically compatible with a human penis than is an anus.
Is that any basis to endorse bestiality?
Why are you incapable of discussing this reality and seemingly only capable of attacking the messenger?