The Forum > Article Comments > Parliamentarians should have a conscience vote on gay marriage > Comments
Parliamentarians should have a conscience vote on gay marriage : Comments
By Rodney Croome, published 1/11/2010For often perverse reasons our parliamentary institutions have failed to keep pace with public opinion on gay marriage.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Page 27
-
- All
For goodness sake... you blokes just don't get Proxy (or me most likely) you are trying desperately to take him literally when he is CLEARLY speaking tongue in cheek on some matters.... learn to discern.
He is SHOWING how stupid it is for the Left (which seems to 'include' a rather high percentage of gays) to constantly support Muslim trampling of our laws, culture and rights without you blokes knowing the slightest thing (it would appear) about the faith itself.
I'll spelllll it out for you 2
1/ "ISLAM" ie...the faith..the fundamentals the foundational documents are clear that the punishment for homosexuals is death.
2/ THE UN is infected with a voting block called the OIC (56 nations)
Organization of Islamic Conference.
3/ THEYYYYYYY are the ones influencing the UN to rescind the inclusion of "sexual orientation" on the list of attributes for which people cannot be arbitrarily executed.
and (the mind boggles) you attack PROXY ? ? ? ?
He's not advocating anything remotely like executing gays.
But RIZ...you take the cake.
"So some moslems are as intolerant and irrational as some christians. What is your point?"
There is no biblical justification for such executions NOW.(New Testament era) In the case of Islam, it is Sharia law. Even if you look up the Canon Law of Protestant Churches you won't find execution for gays there.
We DO NOT teach our children that gays should be executed but guess.. just GUESS who does?
http://www.gaylgbt.com/blog/gay-rights/change/2010/11/saudi-schools-in-the-united-kingdom-teach-children-to-execute-gays/
A-gain...and you are attacking PROXY? *wake up*