Indy,

Word meanings change over time. The word 'racists" is an example, once it had a narrow meaning only, ie a discriminatory opinion pertaining to a particular race, back in the day when a bloke like you called people of colour "jungle bunnies", that was easily identified as racists. Today the word has taken on a broader meaning to encompass prejudices against minorities in society who are different or simply hated for what they are, not necessarily race based, Muslims for example. in this instance would you prefer to be called a bigot rather than a racists.

Okay; "This is when muslims have a "voice" to parliament." What a BIGOTED statement, satisfied.

when a bloke like you called people of colour "jungle bunnies"
Paul1405,
News to me that only people of colour occupy the concrete jungles or are you just saying that so you can bleat racism again ?

Bigoted means fixed in one's opinions and inflexible.

Thus, the village idiot is by definition a BIGOT.

Also, racists is a plural noun where the village illiterate means racist. As the VI bases everything on race he is also a RACIST.

Also,

What the village illiterate is too dumb to understand is that the Muslims in Indonesia are not all of one race. Islam is a religion, not a race. Also, not all Indonesians are Muslim.

Indy,

"Concrete Jungle" and "Concrete Jungle Bunnies", have two different meanings the 'Concrete Jungle' refers to the city, being jungle like constructed mostly of concrete. on the other hand 'Concrete Jungle Bunnies' refers to people living in that city. It was first coined to describe blacks living in American cities, the inference being they had transferred from one jungle of vegetation in Africa, to another jungle of concrete in America, "bunnies" was added disparagingly to give these blacks and air of low intelligence to boot.

Sometimes its "Concrete Jungle Monkeys" the inference there is monkeys being of lower intelligence primates, then like monkeys black people are also monkey like and of lower intelligence. Take your pick.

shadowminister,, you are rather odd, I must get to you, that pleases me, because you spend an inordinate amount of your forum time attacking me. If you're not inferring I'm a paedophile which you often do, its some other crap calling me a fw or some such thing, liar, village idiot etc. GY the moderator seems to give you a great deal of latitude, which others don't enjoy, that's up to him, its his forum, not for me to judge. The worse I call you is "Shonky" rather than "Shadow" which seems to be rather mild compared to your libelist attacks. You are always the instigator on any thread, whilst I simply ignore or occasionally retaliate. As a forum troll you will persist until you secure a negative response. Maybe like some petulant public school boy, you then have the grounds to run off to the headmaster with a complaint. In my opinion you enjoy a certain freedom on here, so carry on regardless.