Dear mhaze,

You wrote:

“Therefore, before wetting our pants, we need to see at what levels of CO2 we'd see 11c increases in global temperature due to that CO2 (9c + 2c)”

Well that is pretty juvenile semantics. You having a bad day?

SR,

Yeah I figured you misunderstood the science.

Dear mhaze,

Mate you don't even accept the science.

"At its alleged natural level of around 280ppm CO2 increases global temperature by c. 9c."

Alleged?

It is rather churlish for you to accuse anyone of misunderstanding it when you dismiss it with your opinion.

SR,

There is significant doubt about the CO2 levels c1850. Its somewhere between 200ppm and 300ppm with 280ppm being a consensus number. There is also significant discussion about whether CO2 levels were stable throughout the past millennia and therefore whether the levels as at 1850AD were representative of all natural levels or perhaps an anomaly.

I'm pretty sure I've taught you about this previously.

Good news for the Brits from their new PM who plans to allow fracking to tap into the UK’s massive gas reserves and has appointed Jacob Rees-Mogg as the minister responsible for energy and Climate Change. He has attacked ‘climate alarmism’, saying humanity should adapt to, rather than mitigate. He also warned that trying to achieve Net Zero was responsible for high energy prices.

Meanwhile, our "highly receptive to climate alarmism" bozos go in the opposite direction, with NSW ready to declare CO2 a pollutant!

In a recent article on energy stupidity in Australia, Alan Moran quoted Cicero, who said " Do not blame Caesar, blame the people of Rome …".

It is the mutton-headed Australian voters who are to blame for the destructive idiots we have in Canberra.

"Squadrons of C grade academics..." - unlike the brilliant minds on display in forums like this.

Why are you wasting your time here and not setting those amateurs at NASA and other half-baked global organisations straight?

Maybe you could even pick up some of that sweet dirty money that's coming from mysterious unknown sources that's conned every government on the planet and invest it in a new coal mine.

Meanwhile I'm interested in seeing some of the peer-reviewed science behind those alternative conflicting notions.