The CSIRO told Senator Malcolm Roberts that today’s temperatures are NOT unprecedented, and that they NEVER said that human-generated carbon dioxide affects the climate. Politicians said that.

Further, nobody in the Greens, Labor or the Coalition has been able to provide Roberts with evidence that carbon dioxide affects climate. His fellow politicians have refused to even debate him on the matter. (Interview with Alan Jones, 7/9/22).

"Climate and CO2: No Evidence, No Debate". The 'Flat Earth' fella is at it again, presenting nonsense, provided by his beloved far right extremists Malcolm Roberts! What a silly topic from the 'Usual Suspect'. The evidence is overwhelming that CO2 causes Climate Change, the debate is long over, action to minimise the harm is what's necessary now.

Someone tell the knuckle draggier Roberts what "unprecedented" means, he wouldn't have a clue.

Hi Paul,

CSIRO is in the top 0.1 % of the world for the core
fields of science and in the world's top 1% for the
other 14 fields. They rank the top 3 of the world's
national science agencies for their input.

Their climate briefings to Senator Roberts as well as
subsequent reponses to his questions are publicly
available on the Senate website. One of which was:

"CSIRO stands behind its researchers and the integrity of
the research they produce. We continue to commit to
full and transparent participation in the scientific peer
review process which results in evidence-based science of the
highest quality, including making data publicly available."

Notice they don't even bother mentioning his name.
That's how high he's held in their esteem.

Anyone who knows anything about the science (you know that thing we're s'posed to follow) would know that the current temperatures ARE NOT unprecedented. Only the brainwashed cultists think otherwise.

eg Marcott et al 2013

Glad that 'flat earth' was brought up. It was the same sorts of people who declared the earth flat that are now blaming a trace gas for climate change. In time, the current lot will look as silly as the flat earthers.

The current lot still hasn't said why it's human induced carbon dioxide that is the villian, and not the 97% of CO2 that occurs naturally. Ian Plimer is still waiting to have this explained to him by people who are so up themselves that they expect us to believe what they say just because they say it. It must annoy them that all people are not gullible fools like Paul 1405.

It was politicians first, starting from Margaret Thatcher, who decided that CO2 affects climate and warms the earth.

Following this decision, scientists were ordered to research this phenomenon and report back to the politicians, with carrots given to bribe those scientists who supported this theory and sticks used against those scientist who refuted it. Moreover, even scientists who disagreed with the above hypotheses had their names added to "scientific" papers that supported it, some without their knowledge, others against their will.

Like everyone else, scientists too have families to feed and mortgages to pay.

Such "evidence" is morally inadmissible, so even if the meteorological reality happened to agree with this corruption, even if we were about to fry or drown due to CO2, it is morally wrong to promote or act on this theory whose birth was in sin.

BTW, I still happen to believe that fossil-digging ought to be phased out, but that for completely different reasons which have nothing whatsoever to do with climate.