With confirmation that lockdowns, vaccines and the 'management' of Covid was a hopeless ballsup, the next penny to drop should be the the CO2 hoax, economy-wrecking Net Zero, and expensive unreliable energy that only Comminist China is benefiting from.

Anybody who considers that lunatic Malcolm Roberts as a sane voice on any matter has problems of their own.

As Project Leader of The Galileo Movement it's obvious where his biassed interests lie and his crazed attempt to be exempted from any Carbon Tax because of his claimed (but later misleading denial of) "Sovereign Citizenship" demonstrate his delusional attitude and willingness to be a shill for the fossil fuel industry.

The misleading but desperate claim about CO2 being a pollutant is wrong. The problem has always been a matter of too much CO2- that's what too much means and the whole denial sideshow has been about deliberately blurring the science.

For example, despite attempts to ban tobacco in the USA because of it's known link to lung cancer in particular, the publicity machine simply had to say that "not everybody who smokes gets lung cancer and not everybody who gets lung cancer has smoked". Same argument, same people behind it, same result.

Somewhere logic and commonsense must play a part in decision making rather than spreading global conspiratorial fantasies.

You appear to know it all rache.

Would you please give me the formulae that prove CO2 is capable of increasing global temperature by any meaningful degree.

Thank you.

I would like proof that Senator Roberts is a lunatic, but I believe that will not be forthcoming either.

They have all been taken in by the co-incidence that coal burning
started around 1800 just as the temperature started to rise from
the Maunder minimum of the Mini Ice Age. It is known cycle 8.
Everything else has been made to fit that reality.

IT IS THE SUN STUPID !

Struth, the idiocy on this thread is astounding even by the standards of this board!

ttbn, of course it isn't completely unprecedented - there have been greater changes before, during global mass extinction events.

But it's never got this hot this fast in human history. And the amount of heat going into the sea is slowing down the warming of the atmosphere.

Human activity has raised atmospheric CO2 levels by 50%. Plimer fools only the gullible; the fact that organisms absorb and reemit CO2 does not change the fact the amount of CO2 released by the burning of fossil fuels is more than enough to raise its CO2 concentration by 50%, meaning that nature is a net absorber of CO2.
__________________________________________________________________________

Hasbeen,
What exactly would you regard as sufficient proof?
Do you accept that there's more infrared radiation coming from the ground than entering the atmosphere from above?
Do you accept that CO2 absorbs infrared and emits it in different directions, And that this results in more infrared being radiated back down?

__________________________________________________________________________

Yuyutsu
Where did you get the crazy idea that it was Thatcher who started it?
Environmentalists had brought the issue to public attention long before she got involved. And scientists had known about it for decades before that.

__________________________________________________________________________

Bazz,
Blaming the sun is stupid, as we're not seeing more solar radiation.
Cycles don't magically affect the temperature.