Paul1405,

Jim Molan is no dummy so I'm guessing his display of ignorance was less to do with understanding the evidence and more about supporting the LNP stance that the burning of fossil fuels is not the source of today's global warming and climate change.

He is just another denialist: a person who refuses to admit the truth of a concept or proposition that is supported by the majority of scientific or historical evidence.

Molin's denialism is motivated by political expediency. He has to be seen as being a team player by both the party members and the public.

Paul 14.05 Klm from Nimbin.

Reading your posts, I see your problem is related to the centre of your introverted, perverted universe, aka Byron Bay, of which obviously, you have become a captive.

A fantasy playground for the bored, rich and famous, to perfect their psycosexually disfunctional lifestyles, around drug fuelled debauchery, and pretence that riding push bikes naked through a CBD is chick, and a a lovely display of left leaning libertarianism.

And it's you who complain the loudest about the misadventures of our common enemy BB.
What's his excuse?
Well I've long ago concluded it's simply a shrunken brain, the outcome of overuse and abuse of the drug alcohol.

My conclusion to all this is, neither side of politics should be influenced by drugs.
And so I support the proposal of Jacqui Lambie,
http://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/jacqui-lambie-calls-for-federal-mps-to-undergo-drug-testing/ar-AAGT53m
to drug test politicians at the beginning of the daily parliamentary sittings, to ensure this country is governed by straight thinking Christians. A cultural necessity, for correct social outcomes.

Dan.

I have written a song about death to the tune of Harrigan.

D – E - A – T - H. It spells death. That’s me.
Many are the lives that I have ended.
Into oblivion they’ve descended.

D – E - A – T - H. it’s the end, you see
When I come, then you go.
When it is, you won’t know.
De-e-eath (clutching throat), that’s me.

The song I just sang is death personified. That is a primitive belief much akin to the animist belief that mountains, trees and other entities have a form of conscious life. Death is not an entity any more than birth or any natural process is. It is just the end of life.
There is no evidence for an afterlife for bacteria, humans or koalas.

In my opinion, it is a copout to ask other people for their opinions on any matter without first giving your own. It is rude and wimpy to expect others to declare themselves without putting your own views first; particularly with such a daft topic available only via the ABC.

Real men say, 'I reckon such and such - what do you think?'

ttbn, getting a bit hot there COC, are you death warmed up?

I think this topic is just too stupid to comment on, so i won't.
Instead I'll comment on the fact that it's that stupid and irrelevant that it falls withing the purview of Mr O and Paul.
So there you go fella's, knock yourselves out.