Yes to Yuyutsu's comment's on modern society; but it's only that way because people kept quiet about it, as they still keeping quiet about perversion and the absurdity of SSM and adoption of children into queer make believe families.

Roman society had no bounds on sexuality, the apostle Paul encounters this especially in Corinth a trading city, that brought traders form around the Empire. Night life and Temple prostitution had no restraints on sexual behaviour.

The apostle Paul introduced purity in marriage to the Christian Church, as even members had not given up incestuous relationships 1 Corinthians 5:1 and they were proud about such. It was making the Church equivalent to the sex temples in the city. 1 Corinthian 5: 9 do not associate in the company of sexually immoral persons who call themselves a follower of Christ. That does not include normal Christian contact with unregenerate persons.

He had to correct immorality in the Church, it is good for a man not to touch a woman [a prostitute 1 Corinthians 6: 15 - 16], [he must respect and refrain from impure passions] As a Christian he should have his own wife instead of lust for prostitutes. The Church still has to deal with the same passion issues today.

That the unregenerate person sees no wrong in immorality, they are not responsible to Christ. They will reap the result of their deeds, sexual disease, poor relationships and damaged children.

Runner, SR is an unregenerate person and sees no immorality in incest, prostitution, adultery as this is normal in his world view. He attempts to pervert the teaching of Christianity to justify his behaviour as normal.

The ultimate agenda post Christian influence on society, is to introduce all sexual behaviours as normal by law. Incest, child brides and homosexuality is then lawfully normal human behaviour as was in pagan society. However it is not Christian morality as designed by our Creator.

Dear Individual,

My point was that a true warrior for nature must be consistent: one cannot honestly criticise a phenomenon on the grounds of it being unnatural while simultaneously promoting other unnatural practices (such as vaccination).

The scientific claims in favour of a certain small percentage of homosexuality go along the lines that homosexuals support their extended families, especially by caring for their nephews and nieces.

In a natural setting, most babies die at a young age, which is why one must procreate much harder. That balance was tipped by human wilfulness and we pay the high price of overpopulation. It could reasonably be that increased homosexuality is nature's second line of defence in trying to restore that balance.

You asked about the personal financial impact it has on me: well couples who produce babies cost me much more than those who do not, even if they have AIDS. Even the schools which government build and maintain for these babies cost more of my tax-money, let alone child-care, universities, healthcare, and other indirect costs (such as to keep the paedophiles that are after these babies in prison). Yes, AIDS also costs through the evils of Medicare, yet far less.

Im not religious so I don’t look at alternative sexual habits from a Christian perspective. I look at these issues from a social and evolutionary perspective.
If homosexuality is inborn, natural and present from birth, and if it had always been accepted and supported throughout history, then no homosexual people would exist today because as they cannot produce children together, the genetic cause would have been eradicated thousands of years ago. As it is, homosexuality should have decreased over the centuries if it has a genetic cause.
And comparison with animals just makes the practise look even worse because not only do animals also engage in incest, pack rape, pedophilia etc, they also engage in inter species sex. That’s very well documented. Monkey having sex with deer, sea lions trying to gave sex with king penguins etc. So no, homosexuality in the animal kingdom is not something we should use as an example of normality.
As for same sex couples raising children, to say that these children do as well as children in a heterosexual family is basically saying that men and women are interchangeable and have no differences. Which has been proved untrue by multiple studies besides being blatantly obvious anyway.

Speaking of the Roman Empire, that’s the fate we are heading for.

There is no proof that anyone is born homosexual, just as there is not proof that people are born in the wrong body - that they are the wrong sex. There is clearly visible evidence that a tiny minority of people, and animals, are born with male and female genitalia.

Any other claims are the product of sick minds.