Bazz etc.,

At least, perhaps we can celebrate same-sex divorces :) I hope they are written into the new legislation.

Joe

Dear Bazz,

So marriage between couples past child rearing age is pointless?

Sure.

What is your next deeply logical argument?

Henry & Bazz,

And to think they used to sneer at marriage!

The thing is that Marxism has to get rid of the family to gain control. Family is the bedrock of democracy. So, it's not really about same sex unions - they already had exactly the same legal deal as married couples - it's all about politics. Given the few SS couples who have bothered to gett 'married', it might not be working the way it was intended. Of course the notoriously Left entertainment industry, including movie makers, television producers and writers now all squeeze in homosexuals when they can.

I read recently that Google was tampering with reality. The writer said that he had googled 'heterosexual couples', but the results came up with a few photos of hetero couples, but after that, same sex couples outnumbered them. I tried it, and he was right.

The same thing applies to a search for white couples: it's not long before you are regaled with everything but white couples - blacks, Asians, Middle Eastern.

It is clear that the social engineers and people obsessed with unnatural sex and race are not giving up. Let's hope the general public treats them with the contempt they deserve.

Ttbn,

There's nothing unnatural about inter-group sex. I can highly recommend it.

Where would you be if your Neanderthal and modern-human ancestors hadn't enjoyed each others' company ?

Joe

«my question sort to find if people held the same views on SSM as they did prior to and at the time it was legalised.»

While my view on SSM has not changed, this question is misleading:
SSM was never legalised because it was not illegal to begin with!

ttbn said;And to think they used to sneer at marriage!

Who me ?