'The scrapping of all observed weather data from 1850 to 1949 was necessary, a spokesman for Environment 'Canada told Blacklock’s Reporter, after researchers concluded that historically, there weren’t enough weather stations to create a reliable data set for that 100-year period..'

just for those interested in facts. See a totally deceitful pattern with this religion
https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/goldstein-feds-scrapped-100-years-of-data-on-climate-change?fbclid=IwAR2dnqR7ftGmPqrlPeCLll_6HViOGsNhSaT0NTuRDj1NocjDVoA0NfFyiWs

Belly,

Your very first post in the thread read...
"Forget man made,is the climate changing
Yes in my view, will it be all bad? no in my view"

Repeat "WILL it be all bad".

ie "will" means future. So yes we were talking about future consequences. I understand that you don't want to talk about that now because it means talking about things you're trying to avoid, but that doesn't mean the rest of us have to pretend otherwise.

Belly, figures representing simple measured facts are the only argument. The rest is is simply conjecture. If you don't believe that, why are you interested in the figures on ice status.

When I have some spare time, I'll have a look at the true facts on ice. Don't expect the truth to be even close to any UN politicking. The only stuff they publish is cherry picked to fit their global government ambitions.

mhaze/ Hasbeen you no me introduced man made in to this
I remain convinced change is real
Too that both positive and negatives will and are resulting
Mhaze yet again you ask questions that I see as weird
Confront me on facts, not neatly built conspiracy you see [after making] in my comments

Figures are merely provided by people, they have nothing to do with facts !

OK Belly, you don't get it.

We all agree the climate's changing.

The consequences of the change depend utterly on its causes. But you don't want to talk about the causes because it always goes bad for you. Trying to talk about the consequences of a problem without knowing the background to the problem is impossible or at best misleading.

What are the consequences of unprotected sex? Surely you understand that you need to know the background. Is it man-women sex? Are both fertile? Is it man-man sex?. Woman-woman?

You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it think.