Foxy,

So far it appears that the tired old outmoded policies of Fiscal discipline, good governance and low taxes seem to be worked compared to the modern and edgy high taxing Labor policies that got it thrashed in May.

Dear Shadow Minster,

Amid the leadership coups, cultural offenses, the
revolving door of energy policy acronyms, the
Australian public has remained steadfast in
the belief that more needs to be done to address
climate change. The majority of the voting public
has not moved from the view that meaningful action is
required by government.

The Coalition comes across every bit as much a fossil as
the fuel they seek to dig up.

When being regularly asked whether people believe Australia
is doing enough to address climate change - the majority
(including one third of Liberal voters) give a resounding
No!

The failure of this government has been not just the
toppling of its leaders. It's been the reason for the
topplings - which has been more than the blind pursuit of
power - but power in the name of energy.

The reckoning is coming. It will be harsh.
Even adding One Nation to its Coalition won't save it.

Foxy,

Everything you accuse the coalition of has recently occurred in both Labor and the Greens, and the electorate has not forgotten. As for GL, the labor party has been consistently selling out Aus for donations:

"Anthony Albanese and Richard Marles, Labor’s leader and deputy leader, are taking their party on a dangerous, foolish, counterfactual, frequently plain wrong detour on China policy. Their strange new departure threatens the ­bipartisan nature of Australian strategic policy, threatens their own credibility, gives Beijing an incentive to bully Australia ­because it can rely on a quasi-­appeasement response from the opposition and therefore hurts Australia’s national interests.

It is profoundly disappointing that Marles while in China did not raise the case of Australian citizen Yang Hengjun, who is in harsh ­detention in China, denied access to his lawyers and shackled while undergoing ritual interrogation sessions, all because he wrote some critical articles about the Chinese government. How can the deputy leader of the Labor Party go to China and not raise this case, in private or in public? Is Labor in favour of human rights except for human beings, especially Australians abused by the Beijing government?

Marles seems to have completed one of those Marco Polo-style journeys Australian politicians sometimes take, where on the road they discover Asia, especially China, with revolutionary new ­insights all unimagined before they left Australia.

Marles’s view here is so ridiculous as to be almost beyond satire."

Shadow Minister,

Your arguments have no credibility.

Give it up.

Foxy,

The election in May and recent polling show that my points have greater credibility than yours.

Shadow Minister,

You need to read other sources.
Yours have no credibility whatsoever.
And the government is currently hanging
on to power by one seat. Not a safe
and adequate win.