I will give you the reference in capital letters;
VINCENT FERNANDO!

The fact is it was Shooters Party legislation introduced into the NSW Parliament, supported by the governing Labor Party, which allowed for the weakening of gun laws. The legislation removed the requirement for a person to firstly obtain a gun licence before the commencement of so called training in the use of a hand gun. Shamin Fernando got a hand gun, no licence, joined your piss weak gun club, and then proceed to murder her father Vincent Fernando. All with the help of the Shooters Party legislative changes!

Paul,

That is not a reference to changing the gun laws that is a reference to one particular unfortunate instance and has more to do with negligence on the part of a club official than changes in gun laws.

So give a reference to where the gun laws have been changed so as to weaken them.

The SF&F Party don't put the safety of chooks above the safety of women as the Greens do, and note that I have referenced that fact, chapter and verse.

Come on Issy, where are chooks mentioned!

Go to the NSW Legislative Council Hansard and read of the watering down of gun laws by the Shooters Party. One day you required a vigorous licence check before beginning so called "training" in the use of a hand gun from the drop kicks down at the notorious SSAA St Marys Shooting Gallery, the next day it was "training" of all commers, including a mentally ill woman, who thanks to their assistance, shot and killed her father!

Typical gunnie attitude; "Oh, well, its just unfortunate, tut tut."

Paul,

Just give a reference to one example of watering down the gun laws.

Don't you remember where I PROVED (and with appropriate references) that the Greens have more consideration for the safety of chooks than women farmers (or any other farmers, for that matter)?

Why are you putting training in parenthesis?

Or are you referring to the system where an interested person can try shooting to see if they like it without going through the hoops and then finding out that they are not really interested?

Saves a lot of time and money, particularly police time.

I'd call it strengthening the law as it shews the law to be reasonable.

SR,

" if you want to make broad brush statements on an Australian site with the assumption people will assume it American you had better think again.

When I wrote "In 1994 in the USA:" and "In 2014 in the USA:" in a thread about "Mass Shootings In America" its not so easy to understand how you could confuse that with data about Australia. Still we are talking about SR here, so any misconstruing of posts is possible.

With no mental health checks required, the majority of gun club members are neanderthdic like knuckle draggers, running around dressed up pretending to be Rambo. Get a go at em, in flak jackets and phoney army fatigues, they look more like Gomer Pyle than Sylvester Stallone.

The cold blooded murder of Vincent Fernando is nothing more than an "unfortunate instance" according to Issy. Like in the John Edwards unfortunate instance, the same morons were responsible for the Shamin Fernando unfortunate instance.

Issy how many more unfortunate instances will have to occur before we take the guns away?