ttbn, correction; it was not a vote, it was a 'survey'.
This puts a whole new emphasis on the value of both the topic and the outcome.
To 'seal the deal', dare I bring up the 'polls' and their surveys showing that Labour was a 'shoe in', in the last election.
I'm sorry but I still stand by my conviction that the 'majority' of Australians were NOT OK with the SSM farce and it's outcome.
I will say how surprised I have been to see the amount of support for the guy.
You know the support is genuine when people actually put their money where their mouth is.

May have been better to highlight pedophilia in the Churches not target others till you fix your own troubles

ALTRAV,

Yes, that's right. I could have made it clearer. Your clarification makes the facts even stronger.

Belly,

"May have been better to highlight pedophilia in the Churches not target others till you fix your own troubles"

Maybe you ought to take your own advice.

http://atheism-analyzed.blogspot.com/2011/08/normalization-of-pedophilia.html

Read Dawkins on paedophillia,
http://www.salon.com/2013/09/10/richard_dawkins_defends_mild_pedophilia_says_it_does_not_cause_lasting_harm/
and this; broaden your outlook.
http://www.algemeiner.com/2011/08/29/a-plea-to-atheists-pedophilia-is-next-on-the-slippery-slope-let-us-turn-back-before-it-is-too-late/

ismise you get a new low for that
Seems you are siding with pedophiles
No child molester should be regarded as human no matter their back ground
EVERY one of them should be locked away forever

Dear Is Mise,

Are you for real?

Thia is what Richard Dawkins said;

"I am very conscious that you can't condemn people of an earlier era by the standards of ours. Just as we don't look back at the 18th and 19th centuries and condemn people for racism in the same way as we would condemn a modern person for racism, I look back a few decades to my childhood and see things like caning, like mild pedophilia, and can't find it in me to condemn it by the same standards as I or anyone would today"

Which is a perfectly reasonable position to take.

Tasmania passes a law to raise the minimum age of marriage from 12 for women and 14 for men to 16 and 18 respectively in 1942.

Were all those 12 year olds getting married back then victims of pedophilia and should their husbands now be judged as pedophiles?

Dawkins clearly states he, and indeed the rest of us, judge things differently now. That should have been enough for you.