Hi Henry,

Yes, many females are quite irresponsible like that. They deserve to be lumbered with a kid for eighteen years. Sluts.

Fortunately, men are as innocent as babes. They have no part to play, and therefore bear no responsibility at all. They probably always urge some form of birth control but are ignored by women. Sluts.

Joe

Joe,

Henry didn't suggest that it was all down to women to make the decisions and ensure proper control activities; you are letting your natural gallantry carry you away. You even piss in that awful Foxy's pocket because she is female, heaven's sake.

Ttbn,

No, I'm simply trying to ask whether or not Runner (and Henry) believe that, in the event that abortion was illegal, men have any role in financially supporting the mother and child until the child is able to support itself, say at eighteen.

Or should women have to bear all the costs, physical, financial, social, etc., of 'getting themselves pregnant' in the event that abortion is illegal ?

In other words, should the prohibition of abortion be a costless event for men ?

No rush, take your time :)

Joe

Joe,

The law already speaks to fathers paying child maintenance.

As for women “getting themselves pregnant”, well short of being raped, they do play a major part in the business. If they chose not to say 'no’ they should be on the pill. This is available now to females we regard as kids, without parental say so, thanks to the feminists and 'equality’ merchants. Then there's the morning after pill.

I have to say that any female getting pregnant other than deliberately has to be an idiot - someone who needs protection from the promiscuous society because they cannot handle it. They want the freedom, then they have to a accept the responsibility or the consequences.

Of course, that's probably too 'alt-right’ for you, and we can't have that sort of nonsense interfering with the 'rights’ of people to do anything they feel like, can we. Nanny should pick up the tab.

Joe

I am not avoiding your question as to men's responsibility of payment for upbringing of an 'unwanted' child. It's probably an issue you can't generalise on. Killing a human life is definitely you can generalise on especially when the vast majority is done for convenience (including monetary). There are actually cases where the father wants to save the baby from murder but is overruled by feminist law/dogma. I think many women would save themselves from much pain and future regret by adopting their child out. Of course callous organisations like planned parenthood who suck millions from the public purse would not encourage a decrease in funding for their murderous industry. I do hope people have the stomach to watch the movie when made available here in Australia.

Ttbn & Runner,

So the answer to the question: "In other words, should the prohibition of abortion be a costless event for men ? " is:

- "um, maybe not BUT .... since women can use the morning-after pill, and anyway adopt their babies out, therefore, well, maybe, eventually,

: yes."

If only I'd known that fifty years ago, as you imply, I could have shagged around to my heart's content :(

Joe