The full Fairfax (be it Age or Sydney Morning Herald) article by an infinitely more authentic journalist than the America, thus Australia hater Assange is:

Peter Greste’s
[founding director and spokesman for the Alliance for Journalists' Freedom...], April 12, 2019 http://www.smh.com.au/national/assange-is-no-journalist-don-t-confuse-his-arrest-with-press-freedom-20190412-p51di1.html

“JULIAN ASSANGE IS NO JOURNALIST: DON'T CONFUSE HIS ARREST WITH PRESS FREEDOM”

Standing before a media scrum in London, Julian Assange’s lawyer Jen Robinson declared that his arrest on Thursday "set a dangerous precedent for all media and journalists in Europe and around the world".

If his extradition were allowed, she said, any journalist could face charges for "publishing truthful information about the United States".

As someone who has been imprisoned by a foreign government for publishing material that it didn't like, I have a certain sympathy with Assange. But my support stops there.

To be clear, Julian Assange is not a journalist, and WikiLeaks is not a news organisation. There is an argument to be had about the libertarian ideal of radical transparency that underpins its ethos, but that is a separate issue altogether from press freedom.

In the American extradition request, WikiLeaks is accused of conspiring with the whistleblower Chelsea Manning to publish a huge trove of military documents in 2010. The documents included the infamous "collateral murder" video filmed from the gunsights of two US Apache helicopters as they opened fire on a group of men in Baghdad, including two Reuters journalists, killing them all.

Other documents included the Afghanistan War Logs, the Iraq War Logs, and "CableGate" – a trove of classified diplomatic cables that contained some embarrassingly undiplomatic analysis of world leaders and their countries. So far so newsworthy.

MORE OF ARTICLE TO FOLLOW

FROM ABOVE

"But Assange went further. Instead of sorting through the hundreds of thousands of files to seek out the most important or relevant and protect the innocent, he dumped them all onto his website, free for anybody to go through, regardless of their contents or the impact they might have had. Some exposed the names of Afghans who had been giving information on the Taliban to US forces.

Journalism demands more than simply acquiring confidential information and releasing it unfiltered onto the internet for punters to sort through. It comes with responsibility.

To effectively fulfil the role of journalism in a democracy, there is an obligation to seek out what is genuinely in the public interest and a responsibility to remove anything that may compromise the privacy of individuals not directly involved in a story or that might put them at risk.

Journalism also requires detailed context and analysis to explain why the information is important, and what it all means.

When The Guardian and The New York Times got hold of the cache of files that Edward Snowden downloaded from the US National Security Agency in 2013, they spent months searching through it to pick out the documents that exposed the extent of the NSA’s surveillance operations. Then, the newspapers took months more to release those stories in a cascade that was as explosive as it was impressive.

In 2015, the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists got hold of more than 11 million documents leaked from the Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca. But the ICIJ did not simply publish and be damned. Instead, it compiled a team of journalists from 107 news organisations across 80 countries, who then spent more than a year going through that vast trove. They carefully dug out evidence that confirmed corruption, tax evasion and the evasion of international sanctions by some of the world’s most powerful business and political elites

http://www.smh.com.au/national/assange-is-no-journalist-don-t-confuse-his-arrest-with-press-freedom-20190412-p51di1.html

MORE TO FOLLOW

FROM ARTICLE ABOVE

It was long, hard and expensive work, but it was also journalism at its finest, fulfilling its watchdog role by fearlessly holding the powerful to account and doing its best to protect the privacy of those who were doing nothing wrong."

"Julian Assange did none of that, so he cannot claim to be a journalist or hide behind arguments in support of press freedom. The distinction matters because of the way the digital revolution has confused the definitions of what journalism is and its role in a democracy.

We at the Alliance for Journalists' Freedom are committed to restoring public trust in journalism, which can only ever happen if its practitioners work with responsibility and respect. It has never been about opening up a hosepipe of information regardless of the consequences.”

http://www.smh.com.au/national/assange-is-no-journalist-don-t-confuse-his-arrest-with-press-freedom-20190412-p51di1.html

ENDS

As the article http://www.smh.com.au/national/assange-is-no-journalist-don-t-confuse-his-arrest-with-press-freedom-20190412-p51di1.html

indicates Assange is merely a political activist, not a true journalist. He mass dumps anti-American (Australia's ally's) secrets.

Assange's treatment of Russian secrets is rare and fawning.

Assange also supports the Edward Snowden franchise of Wikileaks which, with ex-CIA/NSA agent, Snowden's defection to Russia, is harboured by Russia.

It was not an anonymous source that claimed Assange smeared his faeces on the embassy walls:

"Interior Minister Maria Paula Romo said Assange went so far as to smear feces on the embassy’s walls."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2019/04/12/checkout-felt-rushed-julian-assanges-embassy-stay-an-airbnb-review/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.c7de2c5e3d1e

Yet another "darling of the left" turns out to be a complete scumbag. I am sorry the maximum sentence he faces in the US for colluding with Manning is only five years.

Fester,

If I could paraphrase the Left's (and possibly Trump's: go figure) response to your suggestion: "Yes, Assange might be a complete rapist scumbag, but he's OUR complete rapist scumbag."

For revealing names of informants and undercover agents in Afghanistan (just for a start), he might get a hell of a lot more than five years.

Guantanamo would be warming up at this time of year. Couldn't happen to a better scumbag.