There's been so many controversies and outrages over
the past decades from - race-horse ring-ins to Rolf
Harris's fall from grace, to the Fitzgerald Inquiry,
Christopher Scase, Alan Bond, Rose vs Gina, Cash for
Comment, Utegate, Children Overboard, Australian
Wheat Board, Tony Abbott's secret "son", our prison
system that locked up 10 year olds and placed children
as young as 13 in solitary confinement, and more
recently Barnaby's baby, and of course the Royal
Commission into Banking, and also the Royal Commission
into child sexual abuse, and then Cardinal Pell - and the
list still goes on. we've got an inquiry into aged care,
a dead-fish problem, there's also our problem with water,
energy, the Murray-Darling, our rural areas and flooding,
drought, and bushfires - politicians resigning in droves,
and more ...

But hey, the voters they tell us - get it right in the
end? I guess we'll have to wait and see for that one.
In the meantime - at least we now know what - One
Nation really stands for - and it ain't honesty and
integrity - Surprise, surprise?
Or is it?

Liberal and Labor always come up with dirt on One Nation prior to elections: two left-wing parties against the right. I just hope that there are enough voters left who will ignore the Morrison/Shorten rabbiting on about preferences and put preferences where they, THE VOTERS, want to put them.

How stupid is Morrison! Wanting voters to put One Nation below Labor. Or, perhaps he us just further to the loony left than he appears to be: one of the small 'l' liberals calling themselves 'moderates', hoping to hide the fact that they really belong in the Labor party, but were rejected as Turnbull was.

My strategy is still writing 'none if these' on the lower house paper, and voting in the senate for candidates who will restrain whichever crappy major party gains government.

"In the meantime - at least we now know what - One
Nation really stands for - and it ain't honesty and
integrity - Surprise, surprise?
Or is it?"

What we don't seem to care about is what Al Jazeera stands for.

Perhaps it stands for its owners and all that they stand for; it is owned by the government of Qatar.

i found the two men from the one nation party very frighting and extreme, particularly the older man. the old man seems a bit crazy about guns and upset that the government took his guns off him. what would he do if he did control the government as he said he wanted to do.

We should care more about what One Nation stands for.
It's the one trying to run for office in our
parliament.

Foxy,

Don't you have any concerns that Al Jazeera seems to have planned this at least three years ago and sprung it just before the Federal Election?
Al Jazeera's operative tried to snare the SF&F party and also The Sporting Shooters' Assn but to no avail.

Perhaps Al Jazeera can be excused, after all, Qatar is a "bastion of civil rights" and they haven't executed any homosexuals even though they have the death penalty for that offence, they have flogged a few though. Sharia law prevails.