Steele,

“Muslims are the world leaders in making firearms at home.”

Well, they are, so what's wrong with giving credit where it's due?

Jayb,

"In Cities & Towns, lock them in a Central Armory in a Police Facility. There is no need to have guns inside a City or Town limit. Security & Police excepted"

Why except Security and Police, why do they need a gun?

Dear Is Mise,

Nothing at all on the face of it except you were as I said "geeing each other up about a perceived Muslim threat when the topic was about One Nation looking to solicit bribes from a foreign organisation to weaken laws protecting Australians from the type of tragedy which occurred in NZ."

I called you out on it and your response is to claim 'there is nothing to see here'.

My opinion is that is rubbish.

Hi there STEELEREDUX...

C'mon stop with all the semantics, I believe you meant anyone who supported the general availability of firearms, as a clown.

Whenever the very mention of a gun is used, you immediately start berating others concerning shooters rights. As I said, I don't have a gun, but I do support the general shooting fraternity if that is a sport they wish to follow.

Interestingly, most countries field a team in the Olympic games, in many of the shooting competitions, so it's not as if the sport is in any way diminishing.

I do agree, we're completely off Topic here, so can we leave the gun debate where it is for a moment, and return to the Al Jazeera Conspiracy?

Dear o sung wu,

Here is what I actually said;
“Mate you clowns just can't give the fearmongering a break can you. 50 people lay dead from a right-wing extremist inspired by the kind of language you two are rabbiting on with and here you are ratcheting it up again saying things like “Muslims are the world leaders in making firearms at home.””

And I gave you the chance to argue your case.

You decided to come back with;
“C'mon stop with all the semantics, I believe you meant anyone who supported the general availability of firearms, as a clown.”

Now I get that as you have often stated you feel obliged to defend Is Mise. But I feel you could have extended yourself just a little bit rather than a rather insipid “I believe you meant” without offering any justification for holding the aforementioned view.

If you feel the need to exchange a couple of jabs I'm up for it. But perhaps look for some solid footing first.

I'm sure Is Mise won't mind, after all it is his topic.

Let me tell you about one extreme right wing person
He is a Christian, he supports Trump
Has appeared in print calling for less gun control
Even re posted American NRA propaganda in support of it
anyone who thinks everyone should be able to have guns is just as wrong as those saying no one should