Phil, I am simply mortified that one of parliaments Christian Moral Minority, aka George the Christian, may have been led astray by the evilness of the flesh, just as were poor Barney and Andy, has Gods law been broken? Where is Father Joe and Brother runner when you need them.

Paul1405 So I take it that means no criminal offenses committed.

I would say if the 10 commandments were the basis of criminal law everyone would be guilty of something or in some cases a lot of things.

Foxy,

The police investigation into Shorten stalled because 20yrs later there was insufficient evidence not that there was no case to answer.

SR

Complete bollocks from you again. When has visiting any area of the Philipines or Thailand been an offence?

Shadow Minister,

The Police stated quite clearly - there was no
case to answer by Mr Shorten. If you think there
was then - why aren't you also questioning
the case of George Christensen?

Shadow and Phil, please consider the moral aspect. What will the good Christian folk who voted for these three degenerates think, now they find the National Party is populated by so many of the morally perverted.

Shadow, I see Mr Potato Head done a hatchet job on Money Bags Malcolm today in the rabid rights mouthpiece 'The Murdoch Gutter Press', anything to say.

Dear Philip S,

Mate you are getting desperate aren't you. I have already said the following in an earlier post;

“The AFP referral was to ascertain if there was any criminal activity or evidence of blackmail. Neither were found however the contention that Christensen spent time in the less wholesome parts of the Southern Philippines know for drugs and prostitution and that he sent significant amounts of money there has not been challenged at all.

Was it enough to raise a red flag with our security services? Certainly. However in reality any morbidly overweight, middle aged Australian traipsing around the more seedy parts of that country trying to pick up local women far younger than themselves is not deemed illegal in Australia. In fact even if he was consuming drugs over there it would not be against Australian law. “

So why are you now insipidly bleating on with “** Tell us exactly what he has done that constitutes a criminal act? **”?

Is comprehension your main problem? Or is it that you have been spanked around the park in thread after thread and it has you completely rattled? And why have you yet to acknowledge the original leak was from a government MP?

Dear Shadow Minister,

You wrote;

“Complete bollocks from you again. When has visiting any area of the Philippines or Thailand been an offence?”

You bloody clown. You get your facts completely wrong and then accuse me of spouting crap? Firstly I never said travelling in parts of those countries was an offence so stop making things up yet again. Now why don't you clearly state what part of anything I have said is bollocks? Better yet why don't you let us know your source which said the advisory was for Thailand and not the Philippines.

Facts just seem so inconsequential to you nowadays don't they. Trumpism doing its work yet again?